1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Inox Leisure Limited,
as at 31st March, 2011 and also the Profit and Loss Account and the
Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub- section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of
those books.
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account.
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the
directors, as on 31st March, 2011, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31st March, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts, read with the notes
thereon, give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in
the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2011;
b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
c) in the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF THE AUDITORS'' REPORT TO THE
MEMBERS OF INOX LEISURE LIMITED ON THE ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31ST
MARCH, 2011.
In terms of the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003, on the basis
of information and explanations given to us and the books and records
examined by us in the normal course of audit and such checks as we
considered appropriate, to the best of our knowledge and belief, we
state as under:
1. The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
The fixed assets have been physically verified by the management at
reasonable intervals and no material discrepancies have been noticed on
such verification.
Fixed assets disposed of during the year were not substantial and
therefore do not affect the going concern assumption.
2. Inventories were physically verified by the management at
reasonable intervals during the year.
In our opinion, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the company and the nature of its business.
In our opinion, the Company has maintained proper records of its
inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical
verification of inventories as compared to book records.
3. The Company has granted loan to one company covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum
amount involved during the year and the year-end balance is Rs. 1200
lacs. In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and
conditions on which the loan is granted are not prima-facie prejudicial
to the interest of the Company. The company is regular in payment of
interest and no amount was due towards repayment of the principal.
The Company has taken loans from two companies covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The maximum
amount involved during the year and the year-end balance is Rs. 15100
lacs. In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and
conditions on which these loans were taken are not prima-facie
prejudicial to the interest of the Company. The Company is regular in
payment of interest and no amount was due towards repayment of the
principal.
4. In our opinion, there are generally adequate internal control
procedures commensurate with the size of the Company and nature of its
business for purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for sales and
services. During the course of our audit, no major weakness has been
noticed in the internal control systems in respect of these areas.
5. In our opinion, the transactions that need to be entered into the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have
been so entered. In our opinion, for purchase of services made in
pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding
value of rupees five lakhs in respect of any party during the year, no
comparison of prices could be made available as these legal services
are of special nature. There were no transaction of purchase of goods
and materials, and sale of goods, materials and services with parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
6. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public within
the meaning of Section 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of
the Companies Act, 1956 and the Rules framed thereunder and hence the
provisions of clause 4(vi) of the Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the Company.
7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for
maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 for activities of the Company to which the said Rules are
made applicable, and are of the opinion that, prima facie, the
prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained.
9. The Company is generally regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund,
Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax, Wealth-tax,
Service-tax, Customs Duty, Cess, Entertainment Tax and other material
statutory dues applicable to it. No payments were due in respect of
Investors Education and Protection Fund and Excise Duty.
No undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-tax, Wealth-tax,
Sales-tax, Service tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty and Cess were in
arrears, as at the end of the year, for a period of more than six
months from the date they became payable.
Particulars of dues of Income-tax, Sales-tax, Wealth-tax, Service-tax,
Customs Duty, Excise Duty or Cess, which have not been deposited on
account of disputes are as under:
Name of the
statute Nature of dues and the
period to amount forum where dispute is
pending
which the amount
relates (rs. in
lacs)
Service-tax Levy of service tax
on certain income 90.13 Commissioner of
Service-tax, Mumbai
10. The Company does not have accumulated losses and the Company has
not incurred cash losses during the current year and in the immediately
preceding financial year.
11. The Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks.
12. The Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures or other securities.
13. The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit
fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the
Companies (Auditors'' Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
Company.
14. The Company has invested in shares, mutual funds and other
securities in the course of its investment activity. In our opinion,
proper records have been maintained of the transactions and timely
entries have been made therein. These investments are held by the
Company in its own name, except as mentioned in the Schedule 7:
Investments in the Balance Sheet.
15. The Company has not given any guarantee for the loans taken by
others from banks or financial institution.
16. In our opinion, the term loans availed during the year by the
Company were applied for the purpose for which they were raised other
than amounts pending utilization of the funds intended to be used in
the projects under implementation, temporarily kept in fixed deposit
with banks.
17. The Company has not raised funds on short-term basis during the
year.
18. During the year the Company has not made any preferential
allotment of shares to parties covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
19. There are no debentures issued and outstanding during the year and
hence the provisions of clause 4(xix) of the Companies (Auditors''
Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.
20. The Company has not raised any money by way of public issues
during the year.
21. No fraud on or by the Company was noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
for patankar & associates
chartered accountants
firm reg. No. 107628W
(M.y. Kulkarni)
place : pune partner
dated : 26th May 2011 Mem. No. 35524
|