1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of The India Cements
Limited (''the company'') as at March 31, 2011 and also the relative
Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on
that date annexed thereto, which we have signed under reference to this
report. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We have conducted our audit in accordance with Auditing Standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003, as
amended by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004,
issued by the Government of India in terms of Section 227 (4A) of the
Companies Act, 1956 of India (the Act) and on the basis of such checks
as we considered appropriate and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we set out in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(b) In our opinion, the Company has kept proper books of account as
required by law so far, as appears from our examination of those books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement read together with the notes thereon dealt with by this
report have been prepared, in all material respects, in compliance with
the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211
of the Act to the extent applicable;
(e) On the basis of explanations and information given to us and
written representations received from directors, as on March 31, 2011
and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of
the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2011 from being appointed
as a director in terms of Clause (g) of Sub Section (1) of Section 274
of the Companies Act, 1956 having regard to the provisions of the
scheme approved by CDR cell;
(f) Attention is invited to the managerial remuneration referred in
Note No. 23 of Notes on Accounts in Schedule No 17. Subject to the
excess remuneration of Rs.530 lakhs paid / payable to the Managing
Director requiring the approval of the Shareholders and Central
Government, in our opinion and to the best of our information and
according to the explanations given to us, the said financial
statements together with the notes thereon and attached thereto give,
in the prescribed manner, the information required by the Act, and also
give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2011;
(ii) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit for the
year ended on that date; and
(iii) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash Flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS'' REPORT (REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF OUR REPORT
OF EVEN DATE TO THE MEMBERS OF THE INDIA CEMENTS LIMITED)
(i) a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b) As explained to us, the Fixed Assets are physically verified by the
management, according to a phased programme designed to cover all the
items over a period of two years, which in our opinion, is reasonable
having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets.
Pursuant to the programme, the management during the year has verified
a portion of fixed assets and no material discrepancies between the
book records and physical inventory have been noticed.
c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do
not constitute substantial part of the fixed assets of the company and
such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern
status of the Company.
(ii) a) According to information and explanations given to us the
inventories of the Company at all its locations have been physically
verified during the year by the management. In our opinion, the
frequency of verification is reasonable.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures for physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the company and the nature of its business.
c) In our opinion and according to the explanations given to us and on
the basis of our examination of the inventory records, we are of the
opinion that the Company is maintaining proper records of inventory.
The discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as
compared to book records, have been properly dealt with in the books of
accounts. However as regards non-moving and slow moving inventories,
the management is evaluating the use of these items and pending such
evaluation, impact, if any, has not been considered.
(iii) a) According to the information and explanations given to us the
company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies,
firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, sub-clause (b), (c) and
(d) are not applicable.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us the
company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from companies,
firms or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, sub-clause (f) and (g) are
not applicable.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, having regard to the explanations that some of the items
purchased/services awarded are of special nature and suitable
alternative sources are not readily available for obtaining comparable
quotations, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
major weakness in such internal control system.
(v) To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanations given to us, there were no transactions
during the year pursuant to the contracts or arrangements referred to
in Section 301 of the Act. Accordingly, sub clause (b) is not
applicable.
(vi) The Company has during the year accepted deposits from public. In
our opinion, the company has complied with the provisions of Sections
58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Act and Companies
(Acceptance of Deposit) Rules, 1975. To the best of our knowledge and
according to the information and explanations given to us, no order has
been passed by Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or
Reserve Bank of India or any Court or any other Tribunal, in this
regard.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the cost records and accounts relating
to materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the Company
pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under Section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained. We have however not
made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to
determine whether they are accurate or complete. To the best of our
knowledge and according to information and explanations given to us the
Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under
Section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956 for any other activity of
the Company.
(ix) a) According to the records of the Company, the Company is
generally regular in depositing the undisputed statutory dues including
Provident Fund, Employee State Insurance, Investor Education and
Protection Fund, Income tax, Wealth tax, Customs duty, Excise duty,
Cess, Sales tax and Service tax and any other statutory dues applicable
to it with the appropriate authorities though there has been few delays
in depositing Sales tax, Service tax and provident fund.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income tax, Wealth tax,
Service tax, Sales tax, Customs duty, Excise duty and Cess were in
arrears as at the year end for a period of more than six months from
the date they became payable.
c) According to the information and explanations given to us, details
of dues of Sales tax, Income tax, Wealth tax, Service tax, Customs
duty, Excise duty and Cess, which have not been deposited as on 31st
March, 2011 on account of any dispute is as per Annexure.
(x) The Company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year and has not incurred cash losses during financial year
covered by our audit and the immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us the debt
portfolio of the Company was restructured through Corporate Debt
Restructuring Scheme (CDR), based on the said scheme the Company has
not defaulted in repayments of its dues to financial institution, bank
or debenture holders.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual benefit fund
/society. Therefore, the provisions of paragraph 4(xiii) of the
Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
(xiv) In our opinion, and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company is not dealing in or trading in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of paragraph 4 (xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report)
Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.
(xv) In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the company has
given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial
institutions are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company taking
into consideration the overall realisable value of assets and current
business plans.
(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us and on an overall examination, the term loans have been
applied for the purpose for which they were obtained.
(xvii)In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the
Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been
used for long- term investment.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties
and companies covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of
the Act.
(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has created the securities or charges in respect of secured
debentures issued and outstanding at the year-end as per original terms
of issue not withstanding modifications, reschedulement and other
changes in the terms as agreed with CDR cell.
(xx) The company has not raised any money through public issue during
the year.
(xxi) During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company, carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
Auditing Practices in India, and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we have not come across any instance of fraud
on or by the company, noticed or reported during the year, nor have we
been informed of such case by the management.
Annexure to the Auditors'' Report to the Members of The India Cements
Limited for the year ended 31st March 2011
Category Pending With Financial Year Amount Rs. Lakhs
Cenvat Addl.
Commissioner 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 104.01
Appellate
Tribunal 1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98,
1999-00, 2001-02, 2005-06,
2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09,
2009-10, 2010-11 2047.60
Asst.
Commissioner 1998-99, 2008-09, 2009-10,
2010-11 23.08
Commissioner 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05,
2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09,
2009-10, 2010-11 2816.41
Commissioner
(Appeals) 2 000-01, 2009-10, 2010-11 33.15
Dy. Commissioner 2010-11 0.30
Jt. Commissioner 2005-06, 2010-11 50.81
Superintendent 2010-11 0.62
High Court 1994-95, 1995-96, 1996-97,
1997-98, 1998-99, 2000-01,
2006-07, 2007-08 2008-09 258.30
Supreme Court 2008-09 709.74
CST Asst.
Commissioner 1973-74 4.17
High Court 1991-92, 1992-93, 1993-94 76.17
Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal 1991-92, 2008-09 801.31
High Court 1982-83, 1983-84, 1984-85,
1985-86, 1986-87 363.83
Supreme Court 1996-97 810.65
Sales Tax Asst.
Commissioner 1970-71, 1971-72, 1975-76,
1976-77, 1977-78, 1978-79, 109.30
Dy. Commissioner
(Appeals) 1997-98, 2000-01 16.70
High Court 1969-70, 1970-71, 1985-86,
1986-87, 1987-88, 1988-89,
1989-90, 1990-91, 1991-92,
1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95,
1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98,
1998-99, 2002-03 1111.49
Service
Tax Addl. Commissioner 1997-98, 2005-06, 2007-08,
2010-11 148.93
Appellate Tribunal 2003-04, 2005-06, 2006-07,
2007-08, 2008-09 1654.44
Commissioner 2006-07, 2008-09, 2009-10,
2010-11 5302.36
Commissioner
(Appeals) 2000-01, 2006-07, 2007-08,
2008-09 77.45
High Court 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07,
2007-08 178.12
Jt. Commissioner 2007-08 40.81
VAT Addl. Commissioner 2008-09 252.61
Appellate Tribunal 2005-06, 2005-11 52.81
Dy. Commissioner
(Appeals) 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 183.78
High Court 2007-08, 2009-10 592.71
For P. S. SUBRAMANIA IYER & Co., For BRAHMAYYA & Co.,
Chartered Accountants Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No: 004104S Firm Registration
No. 000511S
G.HARIHARAN N.SRI KRISHNA
Partner Partner
Membership No. 15071 Membership No. 26575
Place : Chennai
Date : 30th May, 2011
|