1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Idea Cellular Limited
(''the Company'') as at March 31, 2011, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date,
both annexed thereto (together referred to as ''financial statements'').
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s
Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003, (''the
said Order'' / ''CARO'') issued by the Central Government in terms of
Section 227(4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the annexure
a statement on the matters specified in the paragraphs 4 and 5 of the
said Order.
4. Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to note 2 of
schedule 22 B to the financial statements, the Hon''ble High Court of
Delhi on July 4, 2011 has reaffirmed its order dated February 5, 2010
sanctioning the Scheme of Amalgamation of Spice Communications Limited
(Spice) with the Company. However the judgment transferred & vested
unto the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), the six telecom
licenses granted to erstwhile Spice along with the spectrum (including
two operational licenses for Punjab & Karnataka service areas) till the
time permission of DoT is granted for transfer thereof upon an
application from the Company to that effect.
The Company has filed an appeal before the Appellate Bench of Hon''ble
High Court of Delhi, challenging the above judgment dated July 4,
2011.The Appellate Bench of Hon''ble High Court of Delhi through interim
order has directed DoT to maintain status quo in respect of the two
operational licenses for Punjab & Karnataka and not to take any
coercive action for remaining four non-operational licenses, till the
next date of hearing.
Since the matter is sub-judice, the outcome of which is uncertain at
this stage, we are unable to comment on the consequential impact, if
any, on the financial statements.
5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report as follows:
(a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance
with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the
Companies Act, 1956;
(e) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us and read with our comments in Para 4
above, the said financial statements read together with the notes
thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the
manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2011;
(ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date; and
(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
6. On the basis of the written representations received from the
Directors as on March 31, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2011
from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the
Companies Act, 1956.
Annexure to the Auditors'' Report
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date)
1. In respect of its fixed assets:
a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars,
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
b) The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the
Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification
which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the
fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to information and
explanation given to us the Management is in the process of reconciling
the results of such physical verification with the fixed assets
register. Management believes that differences if any, arising out of
such reconciliation are not expected to be material.
c) The fixed assets disposed off during the year, in our opinion, do
not constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company
and such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern
status of the Company.
2. In respect of its inventory:
a) As explained to us, the inventories, except for those lying with the
third parties, were physically verified during the year by the
Management at reasonable intervals.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its
inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical
verification.
3. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or unsecured,
to / from companies, firms or other parties listed in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, having regard to explanation that certain items purchased
are of special nature and suitable alternative sources are not readily
available for obtaining comparable quotations, there are adequate
internal control procedures commensurate with the size of the Company
and the nature of its business with regard
to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
major weaknesses in such internal controls systems.
5. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there were no contracts, particulars of which needed to be
entered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 and hence provisions of paragraph 4(v)(b) of the said Order
relating to reasonableness of price having regard to prevailing market
price is not applicable to the Company.
6. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not accepted any deposits from the public to which the
directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of
sections 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed
there under are applicable.
7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for
maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 in respect of telecommunication activities and are of the
opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been
made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination
of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or
complete.
9. According to information and explanations given to us in respect of
statutory dues:
a) The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed
dues, including Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income Tax,
Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Cess and other
material statutory dues applicable to it with the appropriate
authorities. As explained to us, the Company did not have any dues on
account of Excise Duty and Investor Education and Protection Fund.
b) There were no undisputed amount payable in respect of Income Tax,
Wealth Tax, Customs Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues in
arrears, as at March 31, 2011 for a period of more than six months from
the date they became payable.
c) There are no dues of Wealth Tax and Cess which have not been
deposited on account of any dispute. Details of dues of Income Tax,
Sales Tax, Service Tax, Customs duty and Entry Tax which have not been
deposited as on March 31, 2011 by the Company on account of disputes:
Name of the Statute Nature of Period to which
Dues the amount pertains
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 2007-08, 2008-09
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 2002-03 to 2010-11
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 2007-08, 2008-09
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 2003 to 2010
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 2002-03 to 2004-05
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 2007-08
Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax 1997-98, 2002-03,
Sales Tax Act, 1957 2003-04, 2004-05
Andhra Pradesh Value Sales Tax 2005-06 to 2007-08
Added Tax, 2005
Delhi Sales Tax Act,
1975 Sales Tax 2003-04, 2004-05
Gujarat Sales
Tax Act, 1969 Sales Tax 1998-99 to 2001-02
Gujarat Sales
Tax Act, 1969 Sales Tax 2006-07
Kerala Sales
Tax Act, 1963 Sales Tax 1997-98
Kerala Sales
Tax Act, 1963 Sales Tax 1998-99
Madhya Pradesh
Commercial Sales Tax 2004-05, 2007-08
Tax Act, 1994
Madhya Pradesh
Commercial Sales Tax 2000-01
Tax Act, 1994
Madhya Pradesh
Commercial Sales Tax 2003-04 to 2006-07
Tax Act, 1994
Punjab VAT Act, 2005 Sales Tax 2006-07, 2007-08
Uttar Pradesh
Trade Tax Act, 1948 Sales Tax 1999-00, 2001-02,
2004-05, 2007-08
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948 Sales Tax 2007-08
(UTTRAKHAND AMENDEMENT)
Uttar Pradesh
Trade Tax Act, 1948 Sales Tax 2006-07
(UTTRAKHAND AMENDEMENT)
Uttar Pradesh
Trade Tax Act, 1948 Sales Tax 2007-08
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948 Sales Tax 2006-07
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948 Sales Tax 2002-03, 2007-08,
2008-09
Uttar Pradesh Value Sales Tax 2006-07, 2007-08,
Added Act, 2008 2009-10
Uttar Pradesh
Trade Tax Act, 1948 Sales Tax 2007-08
Finance Act, 1994 Service Tax 2003-04 to 2009-10
(Service Tax
provisions)
Finance Act, 1994 Service Tax 2003-04 to 2007-08
(Service Tax
provisions)
Finance Act, 1994 Service Tax 1998-99, 2002-03
(Service Tax
provisions)
Finance Act, 1994 Service Tax 1999-00 to 2003-04
(Service Tax
provisions)
Finance Act, 1994 Service Tax 2006-07
(Service Tax
provisions)
Customs Act, 1962 Custom Duty 2003-04
Haryana Land
Development Entry Tax 2002-03
Tax Act.2001
Name of the Statute Amount Forum where the
(Rs. Mn) dispute is pending
Income Tax Act, 1961 11.37 Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax
Income Tax Act, 1961 232.18 Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals)
Income Tax Act, 1961 29.29 Income Tax Officer – TDS
Income Tax Act, 1961 128.38 Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal
Income Tax Act, 1961 4.15 Karnataka High Court
Income Tax Act, 1961 13.56 Commissioner Of
Appeal-III Lucknow
Andhra Pradesh General
Sales Tax Act, 1957 227.46 Andhra Pradesh High Court
Andhra Pradesh Value
Added Tax, 2005 103.66 Andhra Pradesh High Court
Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 92.74 Additional Commissioner
(Appeals)
Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 7.04 Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal
Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 0.83 Assessing officer
Kerala Sales Tax Act, 1963 0.05 Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal
Kerala Sales Tax Act, 1963 0.06 Deputy Commissioner,
Sales Tax
Madhya Pradesh Commercial
Tax Act, 1994 19.70 Deputy Commissioner, Appeal
Madhya Pradesh Commercial
Tax Act, 1994 0.31 CG Appellate Board
Madhya Pradesh Commercial
Tax Act, 1994 10.59 Commercial Tax Tribunal -
Madhya Pradesh
Punjab VAT Act, 2005 61.56 Assistant Excise & Taxation
Commissioner, Chandigarh
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948 3.48 Joint Commissioner (Appeals)
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948
(UTTRAKHAND AMENDEMENT) 1.69 Deputy Commissioner,
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948
(UTTRAKHAND AMENDEMENT) 0.94 Joint Commissioner (Appeals)
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948 1.10 Additional Commissioner
(Appeals)
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948 3.39 Joint Commissioner
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948 1.02 Trade Tax Tribunal
Uttar Pradesh Value
Added Act, 2008 34.13 Commercial Tax Tribunal
Bench II Lucknow
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948 2.73 Allahabad High Court
Finance Act, 1994
(Service Tax provisions) 1,203.79 Customs Excise &
Service Tax Appellate
Tribunal
Finance Act, 1994
(Service Tax provisions) 8.94 Commissioner of
Central Excise (Appeals)
Finance Act, 1994
(Service Tax provisions) 2.98 Punjab & Haryana High Court
Finance Act, 1994
(Service Tax provisions) 3.10 Supreme Court
Finance Act, 1994
(Service Tax provisions) 34.53 Assessing Officer,
Commissioner
Central Excise & Service Tax
Customs Act, 1962 7.12 Customs Excise & Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
Haryana Land Development
Tax Act.2001 9.52 Tribunal
Name of the Statute Nature of Period to which
Dues the amount pertains
Karnataka Tax on
Entry of Entry Tax 2004-05
Goods Act, 1979
MP Entry Tax Act, 1976 Entry Tax 1998-99 to 2000-01
MP Entry Tax Act, 1976 Entry Tax 1998-99 to 2006-07
MP Entry Tax Act, 1976 Entry Tax 2005-06 to 2007-08
Orissa Entry Tax
Act, 1999 Entry Tax 2008-09, 2009-10
Rajasthan Tax On
Entry Of Entry Tax 2008-09
Goods Into Local
Areas Act, 1999
The Uttar Pradesh
Tax on Entry of Entry Tax 2007-08
Goods Act, 2000
The Uttar Pradesh Tax
on Entry of Entry Tax 2006-07
Goods Act, 2000
The Uttar Pradesh
Tax on Entry of Entry Tax 2004-05
Goods Act, 2000
The Uttar Pradesh
Tax on Entry of Entry Tax 1999-00, 2001-02 to
Goods Act, 2000 2003-04, 2007-08
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948 Entry Tax 2001-02,2002-03,
(UTTRAKHAND AMENDEMENT) 2003-04
The Uttar Pradesh Tax
on Entry of Entry Tax 2007-08
Goods Act, 2000
Bihar Value Added
Tax Act, 2005 Entry Tax 2009-10
Name of the Statute Amount Forum where the
(Rs. Mn) dispute is pending
Karnataka Tax on Entry of
Goods Act, 1979 8.92 Karnataka High Court
MP Entry Tax Act, 1976 0.13 Assistant Commissioner,
Entry Tax
MP Entry Tax Act, 1976 14.72 Commercial Tax Tribunal -
Madhya Pradesh
MP Entry Tax Act, 1976 22.47 Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)
Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 5.20 Orissa High Court
Rajasthan Tax On Entry Of
Goods Into Local
Areas Act, 1999 2.41 Rajasthan High Court
The Uttar Pradesh Tax
on Entry of
Goods Act, 2000 2.03 Additional Commissioner
(Appeals)
The Uttar Pradesh
Tax on Entry of
Goods Act, 2000 0.22 Deputy Commissioner
The Uttar Pradesh
Tax on Entry of
Goods Act, 2000 2.08 Joint Commissioner (Appeals),
Commercial Tax.
The Uttar Pradesh
Tax on Entry of
Goods Act, 2000 11.18 Trade Tax Tribunal
Uttar Pradesh Trade
Tax Act, 1948
(UTTRAKHAND AMENDEMENT) 0.57 Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttar Pradesh
Tax on Entry of
Goods Act, 2000 6.00 Joint Commissioner (Appeals)
Bihar Value Added
Tax Act, 2005 1.73 Joint Commissioner (Appeals),
Commercial Tax.
10. The Company does not have accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year and the Company has not incurred cash losses in the
financial year and in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to
banks and financial institutions.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. The Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit fund /
society. Therefore, the provisions of paragraph 4(xiii) of the said
Order are not applicable to the Company.
14. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments.
15. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions. Therefore, the provisions of
paragraph 4 (xv) of the said Order are not applicable to the Company.
16. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purposes for
which they were obtained, other than temporary deployment pending
application.
17. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet, we
report that funds raised on the short term basis amounting to Rs. 16,457
Mn have been used during the year for long term investment.
18. According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not made preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
19. According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not issued any debentures during the year.
20. According to information and explanations given to us, during the
year covered by our audit report, the Company has not raised any money
by public issue.
21. According to the information and explanations furnished by the
Management, which have been relied upon by us, there were no frauds on
or by the Company noticed or reported during the course of our audit
except few cases of fraud by employees and by external parties
estimated at Rs. 0.92 Mn detected by the Management for which appropriate
steps were taken to strengthen controls.
For Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Chartered Accountants
(Registration No. 117 366W)
Hemant M. Joshi
Partner
(Membership No.: 38019)
Place: Mumbai
Date: July 29, 2011
|