Real-time Stock quotes, portfolio, LIVE TV and more.
-0.55 (-1.19%)
-0.45 (-0.98%) | Auditor's Report (HeidelbergCement India) | Year End : Dec '12 |
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Heidelberg Cement
India Limited (''the Company'') as at December 31, 2012 and also the
Statement of profit and loss and the cash flow statement for the year
ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company''s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose
in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4
and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
iii. The balance sheet, statement of profit and loss and cash flow
statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, statement of profit and loss and
cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
v. On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors, as on December 31, 2012, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
December 31, 2012 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India;
a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at December 31, 2012;
b) in the case of the statement of profit and loss, of the profit for
the year ended on that date; and
c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the
management during the year but there is a regular programme of
verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the
size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(c) There was no disposal of a substantial part of fixed assets during
the year.
(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
(iii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us,
the Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(iii)(a) to (d) of the Order are not applicable
to the Company and hence not commented upon.
(b) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or
other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause
4(iii)(e) to (g) of the Order are not applicable to the Company and
hence not commented upon.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for sale of goods. The
activities of the Company do not include sale of services. During the
course of our audit, we have not observed any major weakness or
continuing failure to correct any major weakness in the internal
control system of the Company in respect of these areas.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the
management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or
arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 that
need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 have
been so entered.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements and exceeding the value of Rupees five lakhs have been
entered into during the financial year at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956, related to the manufacture of cement and are of the opinion
that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made
and maintained.
(ix) (a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,
investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance,
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
duty and other material statutory dues applicable to it.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax,
wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty cess and
other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Name of Statute Nature of Amount
dues (Rs. in million)
Central Sales Tax Sales Tax 62.4
Act and Various
56.3
State Sales Tax Act
0.1
4.2
5.7
778.8
Various State Entry UP Entry Tax 73.2
Tax Act
UP Entry Tax 47.7
MP Entry Tax 165.0
MP Entry Tax 188.1
MP Entry Tax 1.5
MP Entry Tax 0.7
Income Tax Income Tax 2.7
Act,1961
Income Tax 3.4
Central Excise Excise Duty 7.9
Act,1944 and Cenvat 21.9
39.7
3.2
Customs Act, 1962 Custom Duty 8.9
Finance Act Service Tax 2.6
(Amended 2009)
Service Tax 2.7
Name of Statute Period to which the Forum where dispute is
amount relates pending
Central Sales Tax
Act and Various
State Sales Tax Act 1998-99 to 2004-05 Supreme Court
1994-95, 1997-98, High Court
2000-01 to 2004-05
and 2009-2010
1997-98 and 2002-03 Appellate Tribunal
2000-01 and 2001-02 Deputy Commissioner
(Appeals)
1999-00 to 2002-03 Joint Commissioner of
Commercial Taxes (Appeals)
1984-85, 1995-96 Assessing Officer
to 2007-08
Various State Entry
Tax Act 2003-04 to 2009-10 Supreme Court
2003-04 and 2007-08 Assessing Officer Sales Tax
2005-06 to till date Supreme Court
1999-2000 to 2007-08 Assessing Officer Sales Tax
2000-01, 2004-05, Assessing Officer
2005-06, 2009-10
1987-88 to 1997-98 High Court
Income Tax Act, 1961 2007-08 Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal
2003-04 High Court
Central Excise
Act, 1944 2007-08 Supreme Court
1995-96 to 2000-01 High Court
1992-93, 1995-96, Central Excise and Service
Tax
1996-97, 1999-2000 to Appellate Tribunal
2003-04 and 2005-06
to 2008-09
Customs Act, 1962 2007-08 Commissioner of Central
Excise (Appeal)
2006-07, 2009-10
to 2011-12 Assessing Officer
Finance Act 2007-08 to 2010-11 Commissioner of Central
Excise (Appeal)
2007-08 to 2010-11 Central Excise and Service
Tax Appellate Tribunal
(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately
preceding financial year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks. The Company
has no outstanding dues in respect of debenture holders and financial
institutions.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced before us, the Company has
not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of
pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as amended)
are not applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order,
2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
(xvi) Based on information and explanations given to us by the
management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans
were obtained, though idle/surplus funds which were not required for
immediate utilization have been gainfully invested in liquid
investments payable on demand. The maximum amount of idle/surplus
funds invested during the year was Rs. 2,195 million of which Rs. 150
million were outstanding at the end of the year.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money through public issue during
the year.
(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the year.
For S.R. Batliboi & Co.
Firm Registration No. 301003E
Chartered Accountants
Sd/-
per Manoj Gupta
Partner
Membership No.:83906
Place : Gurgaon
Date : February 11, 2013 |
|
![]() | |
| Source : Dion Global Solutions Limited | |
![]() | |