1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of HANUNG TOYS AND
TEXTILES LTD., as at 31st March, 2011 and also the Profit and Loss
account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material mis-statement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that :
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of
those books of the Company.
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account of the Company.
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of representations made by the directors as on 31st
March, 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors of the
Company, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31st March, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956 on the
said date;
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with
Significant Accounting Policies and Notes on Accounts in Schedule and
those appearing elsewhere in the accounts, give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
company as at 31st March, 2011;
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on the date.
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE OF
HANUNG TOYS AND TEXTILES LTD.
On the basis of such checks as we considered appropriate and in terms
of the information and explanations given to us, we state that:
1. (a) The Company has generally maintained proper records showing
full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) As explained to us and according to the practice of the Company,
all the assets have not been physically verified by the management
during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which,
in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the company
and the nature of its assets. According to the information and
explanations given to us, discrepancies noticed, if any, on physical
verification have been adjusted in the books of account.
(c) During the year, the company has not disposed off a substantial
part of its fixed assets so as to affect its going concern.
2. (a) As explained to us, inventories have been physically verified
during the year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of
verification is reasonable.
(b) The procedures explained to us, which are followed by the
management for physical verification of inventories, are in our opinion
reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the company and the
nature of its business.
(c) On the basis of our examination of the records of inventory, we are
of the opinion that the company is maintaining proper records of
inventory. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the
physical stocks and the book stocks, if any, have been properly dealt
with in the books of account;
3. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has neither taken nor granted any loan, secured or unsecured,
from/to Companies, firms or other parties listed in the register
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act,1956;
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are generally adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and with
regard to the sale of goods. During the course of our audit, no major
weakness in the internal controls, had come to our notice;
5. Based on the audit procedures applied by us and according to the
information and explanations provided by the management, we are of the
opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into the register
maintained under section 301 have been so entered. In our opinion and
according to the information and explanations given to us, the
transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in
the registers maintained under section 301 and exceeding the value of
five lakh rupees in respect of any party during the year have been made
at prices which are reasonable having regard to prevailing market
prices at the relevant time.
6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not accepted any deposits from the public
within the meaning of Section 58 A and 58 AA of the Companies Act,1956
and the rules framed thereunder ;
7. In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
8. Accounting to the information and explanations given to us, the
Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under
clause (d) of sub section (1) of Section 209 of the Companies Act,
1956.
9. (a) According to the records of the company, the company is regular
in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues
including Provident Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-Tax,
Sales-Tax, Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise-Duty, Cess and other
statutory dues applicable to it.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-Tax, Wealth-Tax, Sales
Tax, Customs Duty and Excise Duty were outstanding, as at 31st March,
2011 for a year of more than six months from the date they became
payable.
(c) According to the records of the company, there are no dues of Sale
Tax, Income Tax, Customs Duty, Wealth-Tax, Excise Duty/Cess, which have
not been deposited on account of any dispute.
10. The Company has neither accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year nor has it incurred cash losses, both, in the financial
year under report and the immediately preceding financial year.
11. Based on our audit procedures and on the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
institution, bank or debenture holders.
12. As explained to us, the company has not granted any loans and
advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of shares,
debentures and other securities.
13. The Company is not a Chit Fund or a Nidhi Mutual benefit
Fund/Society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the
Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
14. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in Shares, Securities, Debentures and
Other Investments. Accordingly, the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the
Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order 2003 is not applicable to the
Company.
15. According to the information and explanations given to us, and the
representations made by the management, the Company has not given any
guarantee for loans taken by others from any bank or financial
institution.
16. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
term loans have been applied for the purpose for which they were
raised.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance Sheet of the company, we report
that the no funds raised on short- term basis have been used for
long-term investment. No long-term funds have been used to finance
short-term assets except core (permanent) working capital.
18. Based on our examination of records and the information provided
to us by management we report that the company has not made
preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in
the register maintained under section 301 of the Act.
19. According to the information and explanation given to us, no
debentures have been issued by the Company during the year.
20. According to the information and explanation given to us, the
Company has not raised any money by public issue during the year.
21. Based upon the audit procedures performed and information and
explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud on or by
the company has been noticed or reported during the course of our
audit.
For ROHTAS & HANS
Chartered Accountants
Hans Jain
Place:Noida Partner
Date : August 24, 2011 Membership No.: 82912
|