1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of GVK Power &
Infrastructure Limited (the Company) as at March 31, 2011 and also
the Profit and Loss account and the Cash flow statement for the year
ended on that date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose
in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4
and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
iii. The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash
flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 ot the
Companies Act, 1956;
v. On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors, as on March 31, 2011, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
March 31, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2011;
b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date and
c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date
Re: GVK Power & Infrastructure Limited (the Company)
i) a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during
the year and no material discrepancies were identified on such
Verification.
c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.
ii) In view of the nature of operations carried out by the Company, it
has no inventory. Accordingly, the provisions of clause (ii) of the
paragraph 4 of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) in respect of the inventories are not applicable.
iii) a) The Company has granted loan to one Company covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The
maximum amount involved during the year was Rs.275 thousands and the
year end balance of loans granted to such party was Rs. Nil.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for
such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the
Company.
c) The loans granted are re-payable on demand. As informed, the company
has not demanded repayment of any such loan during the year, thus,
there has been no default on the part of the parties to whom the money
has been lent. The loan given is interest free.
d) There is no overdue amount of loans granted to companies, firms or
other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
e) As informed, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or
unsecured from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956.
Accordingly, the provisions of the clauses (iii) (f) to (g) of
paragraph 4 of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) are not applicable.
iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of fixed assets and for the sale of services. Due to the
nature of its business, the Company does not purchase any inventory or
sell goods. During the course of our audit no major weakness has been
noticed in the internal control system in respect of these areas.
During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing
failure to correct major weakness in internal control system of the
company.
v) a) According to the information and explanations provided by the
management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or
arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Act that need to be
entered into the register maintained under section 301 have been so
entered.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, transactions made in pursuance of such contract or
arrangement exceeding value of Rupees five lakhs have been entered into
during the financial year at prices which are reasonable having regard
to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time, except for
services provided to one party aggregating to Rs.138,663 thousand and
services availed from one party aggregating to Rs. 8,935 thousand
because of the unique and specialized nature of the items involved and
absence of any comparable prices, we are unable to comment whether the
transactions were made at prevailing market prices at the relevant
time.
vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central
Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause
(d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for
the services of the Company.
ix) a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate
authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,
investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance,
sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess as
applicable except for income tax where there is slight delay in few
cases.
Further, since the Central Government has till date not prescribed the
amount of cess payable under section 441 A of the Companies Act, 1956,
we are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of
the company in depositing the same.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax,
wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and
other undisputed statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for
a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:
Name of the
statute Nature of dues Amount Period to which Forum where
(Rs.
thousand) the amount
relates dispute is
pending
The Finance
Act, 1994 Service Tax 53,910 July 1, 2003 to Commissioner
of Central
September 30,
2010 Excise and
Customs -
Visakhapatnam -II
Indian Stamp
Act, 1899 Stamp duty 282,960 February 4,
2008 High Court of
Andhra Pradesh
Income Tax
Act, 1961 Income tax 7,298 Assessment
year Commissioner of
Income
liability 2008-09 Tax (Appeals )
-Rajahmimdry
x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately
preceding financial year.
xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
institution, bank or debenture holders.
xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of
snares, debentures and other securities.
xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended)
are not applicable to the Company.
xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company,
xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given guarantee for loans taken by others from bank or
financial institutions, the terms and conditions whereof in our opinion
are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
xvi) Based on information and explanations given to us by the
management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans
were obtained.
xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that no funds raised on short term-basis have been used for long term
investments.
xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties or companies covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
year.
xx) The Company did not raise any money through a public issue the
during the year.
xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the course of our audit.
For S R Batliboi & Associates
Firm Registration No : 101049W
Chartered Accountants
per Vikas Kumar Pansari
Partner,
Membership No.: 93649
Place : Hyderabad
Date : May 7, 2011
|