1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of GULF OIL Corporation
Limited (the Company) as at 31st March, 2011, the Profit and Loss
Account and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended
on that date, both annexed thereto, in which are incorporated the
Returns from the Lubricants Branch audited by other auditors. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company''s
Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and the disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates
made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (CARO)
issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 227(4A) of the
Companies Act, 1956, we give in the Annexure a statement on the matters
specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(i) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(ii) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of
those books and proper returns adequate for the purposes of our audit
have been received from the Lubricants Branch audited by other
auditors;
(iii) the reports on the accounts of the Lubricants Branch audited by
other auditors have been forwarded to us and have been dealt with by us
in preparing this report;
(iv) the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account and the audited Branch Returns;
(v) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance
with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the
Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2011;
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
5. On the basis of the written representations received from the
Directors and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that
none of the Directors is disqualified as on 31st March, 2011 from being
appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the Companies
Act, 1956.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS'' REPORT
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date)
(i) Having regard to the nature of Company''s
business/activities/result, clauses (x), (xii), (xiii), (xiv), (xviii)
and (xix) of CARO are not applicable.
(ii) In respect of its fixed assets:
(a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars,
including quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.
(b) The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the
Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification
which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the
fixed assets at reasonable intervals. In respect of assets physically
verified no material discrepancies were noted.
(c) As explained in Note 2 of Schedule 18 to the Financial Statements,
during the year, the Company has transferred a substantial part of its
fixed assets in accordance with a Scheme of Arrangement. Such transfer,
has in an opinion not affected the going concern status of the Company.
(iii) In respect of its inventories:
(a) As explained to us, inventories were physically verified during the
year by the management at reasonable intervals.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management were reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has maintained proper records of its
inventories and no material discrepancies were noticed on physical
verification.
(iv) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or
unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties listed in the
register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchases of inventory and fixed assets and the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
major weakness in such internal control system.
(vi) As explained to us and according to the information and
explanations given to us, there are no transactions that need to be
entered in the register maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly clause 4(v)(b) of the CARO is not
applicable.
(vii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of Sections
58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act,
1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard
to the deposits accepted from the public. According to the information
and explanations given to us, no order has been passed by the Company
Law Board or the National Company Law Tribunal or the Reserve Bank of
India or any Court or any other Tribunal.
(viii) In our opinion the Company has an adequate internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(ix) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under Section 209(1) (d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 in respect of manufacture of lubricants and are of the
opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been
made and maintained. We have, however, not made a detailed examination
of the records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or
complete. To the best of our knowledge and according to the information
and explanations given to us, the Central Government has not prescribed
the maintenance of cost records for any other product of the Company.
(x) According to the information and explanations given to us in
respect of statutory dues:
(a) The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed
dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund,
Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service
Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues
applicable to it with the appropriate authorities.
(b) There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-tax,
Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other material statutory
dues in arrears as at 31st March, 2011 for a period of more than six
months from the date they became payable.
(c) Details of dues of Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax,
Custom Duty, Excise Duty and Cess which have not been deposited as on
31st March, 2011 on account of disputes are given below:
Name of the Nature of Period to which the Amount
Statute dues amount relates (Rs. Lakhs)
Central Excise 1980-87 6.12
Excise Act, 1944 Duty
1992-96 1.11
2003-04 4.61
2006-07 631.44
Sales Tax Act Sales 1992-93, 1994-95, 1995-96, 1375.78
Tax 1998-99 & 2003-04
1977-78 to 1983-84,1984-85, 1458.16
1985-86, 1986-87, 1987-88,
1989-90 & 1990-91
1976-77 to 1983-84 927.37
1976-77 to 1983-84, 234.29
1997-98 & 2008-09
2001-02,2003-04&2004-05 9.26
2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, 300.98
2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 &
2008-09
2005-06, 2006-07 & 2007-08 54.21
Service Tax Act, Service 2004-06 2.25
1994 Tax
2006-07 to 2007-08 1348.71
Income Tax Income- 2001-02 10.27
Act, 1961 Tax
2003-04 437.33
2004-05 552.52
Wealth Tax, Wealth 2002-03 51.97
1957 Tax
2003-04 86.82
Lubricants
Central Excise Excise 2007-08 16.04
Act,1944 Duty
2009-10 96.11
Sales Tax Act Sales Tax 1994-95 & 1999-2000 6.54
1999-2000, 2001-02 & 2003-04 111.86
2003-04 816.52
2004-05 1186.84
Income Tax
Act,1961 Income Tax 1999-2000 & 2000-01 12.75
Customs Act, Customs 2006-07 15.41
1962 Duty
Name of the
Statute Forum where dispute is pending
Central
Excise Act, 1944
Asst. Commissioner
Central Excise & Customs
Commissioner Appeals,
Central Excise & Customs
High Court
Central Excise and Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
Sales Tax Act
Sales Tax Tribunal, Orissa
High Court, Orissa
Additional Commissioner
Commercial Taxes
Commissioner Commercial
Taxes
Assistant Commissioner
Commercial Taxes
Joint Commissioner
Service Tax Act,
1994
Central Excise and Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
Central Excise and Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal
Income Tax
Act, 1961
Income tax
Appellate Tribunal
Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals)
Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals)
Wealth Tax,
1957
Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals)
Commissioner of Wealth Tax
(Appeals)
Lubricants
Central Excise
Act,1944
Central Excise and Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal , Mumbai
Joint Commissioner
Central Excise & Customs
Sales Tax Act
Hon''ble High Court
Deputy Commissioner Sales Tax
Joint Commissioner Sales Tax
Appeals II
Joint Commissioner Sales Tax
Appeals II
Income Tax
Act,1961
Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals)
Customs Act,
1962
Central Excise and Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us having regard to roll over of buyer''s credit by bank, the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of its dues to banks or
financial institutions during the year.
(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the terms and conditions of the guarantees given by the
Company for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions
are not prima facie prejudicial to the interests of the Company.
(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purposes for
which they were obtained.
(xiv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet, we
report that funds raised on short-term basis have not been used during
the year for long- term investment.
(xv) The management has disclosed the end use of money raised by public
issue and we have verified the same.
(xvi) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and
explanations given to us, no fraud by the Company and no fraud on the
Company has been noticed or reported during the year.
For Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Chartered Accountants
(Registration No. 008072S)
K.Rajasekhar
Partner
(Membership No.23341)
Place: Hyderabad
Date : May 25, 2011
|