1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Great Offshore
Limited as at March 31, 2011 and also the Profit and Loss Account and
Cash filow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date,
both annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003, as
amended by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2004, issued by the
Central Government of India in terms of section 227 (4A) of the
Companies Act, 1956, we annex hereto a statement on the matters
specifed in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph
(3) above, we report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit.
b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of such
books.
c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash filow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account.
d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
filow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
e) We draw attention to Note 19 of Schedule 19, Notes to Account. The
Company has changed its accounting policy w.e.f. January 01, 2011 in
respect of expenses of spares, stores & consumables in line with
Accounting Standard (AS) 2 - Valuation of Inventories by which
spares, stores & consumables on board the vessels which are not
consumed are accounted as inventory. Accordingly, as on 31st March 2011
the Company has accounted Inventory amounting to Rs.5580 lakhs and
disclosed the same as an Exceptional item. This has resulted in stating
of profit of the company for the year higher by Rs. 5580 lakhs.
f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read with the notes
thereon, give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in
the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2011;
ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date; and
iii) in the case of the Cash filow Statement, of the cash fows for the
year ended on that date.
5. On the basis of written representations received from the directors
of the Company as on March 31, 2011, and taken on record by the Board
of Directors, we report that none of the directors of the Company are
disqualifed as on March 31, 2011, from being appointed as a director in
terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
Annexure to the Auditor''s Report
Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date on the accounts
of Great Offshore Limited for the year ended March 31, 2011:
1. (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of
fixed assets.
(b) The fixed assets are physically verifed by the management as per a
phased programme of verification. In our opinion, the frequency of
verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and
the nature of its assets. To the best of our knowledge no material
discrepancies were reported on such verification.
(c) In our opinion, the fixed assets disposed off during the year were
not substantial and do not affect the going concern assumption.
2. (a) We have been informed that the Management has physically
verifed inventory at the year end. We have been provided
a management certificate for the same. In our opinion, the frequency of
verification is not reasonable.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the Management needs to be further strengthened.
(c) The Company''s records of the inventory have not been adequately
updated. In the absence of updated records we are unable to comment
whether the discrepancies noticed on the verification between physical
inventories and book records have been properly dealt with in the books
of accounts.
3. (a) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(b) The Company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business for the
purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale of goods except for
maintenance of inventory records. Further, on the basis of our
examination of the books of account and records of the Company, and
according to the information and explanations given to us, we have
neither come across nor we have been informed of any continuing failure
to correct major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control system
except in relation to inventory records maintenance.
5. Based on the audit procedures applied by us and according to the
information and explanations provided by the management, the
particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of
the Act have been entered in the register required to be maintained
under that section.
In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given
to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements have been made at prices which are reasonable having
regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public
within the meaning of sections 58A and 58AA of the Act and the rules
framed there under.
7. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system, which is
commensurate with the size and nature of its business except in case of
inventory which is presently not within the scope of internal audit.
8. As informed to us, the maintenance of cost records has not been
prescribed by the Central Government under section 209(1) (d) of the
Companies Act, 1956, in respect of the activities carried on by the
Company.
9. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
according to the books and records as produced and examined by us, in
our opinion, the company is generally regular in depositing undisputed
statutory dues including Shore Staff Provident fund, Investor Education
and Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income tax, Sales tax,
Wealth tax,
Service tax, Excise duty, Customs duty, Cess, and other statutory dues
with the appropriate authorities. We are informed that in respect of
foating staff it is not possible to accurately ascertain the income tax
on salaries (under section 192) of the employees. The Company regularly
makes ad hoc payments to the appropriate authorities and on final
determination the balance, if any, is paid.
(b) According to the books of account and records as produced and
examined by us, there are no dues of Sales tax, Income tax, Custom
duty, Wealth tax, Service tax, Excise duty or cess which have not been
deposited on account of any dispute, other than those stated below:
Name of the statute Nature of Dues Amount Period to Forum where
dispute is
(Rs. In which the pending
Lakhs) amount
relates
The Tamil Nadu General
Sales Tax Tax u/s 3A of The 100.78 1995-96
and The Sales Tax
Appellate
Act 1959 Tamil Nadu General 1996-97 Tribunal,
Chennai
Sales Tax Act,
1959
The Karnataka Sales
Tax Act , 1957 Tax u/s 5-C of the
Act 170.71 1995-96
to Stay granted
by Supreme
2001-02 Court
The Karnataka Sales
Tax Act , 1957 Sales Tax 6.03 2007-08 Assistant
Commissioner
(CT) III,
Enforcement
Wing
The Customs Act,
1962 Customs Duty 70.37 2001-02 Customs
Excise and
Gold
(Control)
Appellate
Tribunal
The APVAT Act, 2005 VAT 96.53 2004-05 APGST /
SPVAT Malviya
2005-06 Nine - dee
med Trans
fer of
right to
use
Central Excise and
Customs Act Service Tax 72.53 2002-03
to Superintend
ent of
2004-05 Central
Excise
West Bengal Sales
Tax Act Sales Tax 41.59 2001-02 The Commiss
ioner of
Commercial
Taxes,
Kolkatta
10. The Company has no accumulated losses as at the end of the
financial year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the current
year and in the immediately preceding financial year.
11. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records examined by us, the company has not defaulted in repayment of
dues to a financial institution or bank or the debenture holders.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records examined by us, the Company has not granted any loans on the
basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures or other
securities.
13. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the nature of the activities of the Company does not
attract any special statute applicable to the chit fund and nidhi/
mutual benefit fund/ societies.
14. In our opinion, the Company has maintained proper records of the
transactions and contracts of the investments dealt in by the Company
and timely entries have been made therein. The investments made by the
Company are held in its own name except to the extent of the exemption
under section 49 of the Act.
15. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records examined by us, the Company has not given any guarantees for
loans taken by others from banks or financial institutions, the terms
and conditions whereof are prima facie prejudicial to the interest of
the Company.
16. According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records examined by us, on an overall basis, the term loans were
applied by the Company for the purpose for which they were obtained.
17. On the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet and
cash fows of the Company and the information and explanation given to
us, we report that the Company has not utilised any funds raised on
short-term basis for long-term investments.
18. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties or companies covered under section 301 of the Act.
19. According to the explanation given to us, securities have been
created in respect of the debentures taken over by the Company pursuant
to the Scheme of Arrangement. These debentures have been redeemed
during the year.
20. The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during
the year.
21. Based upon the audit procedures performed and the information and
explanations given by the management, we report that no fraud on or by
the Company has been noticed or reported during the year.
For and on behalf of
KALYANIWALLA & MISTRY
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Registration No. 104607W
VINAYAK M. PADWAL
Partner
M. No. F49639
Mumbai, June 21, 2011.
|