SENSEX NIFTY
Godrej Consumer Products | Auditor's Report > Personal Care > Auditor's Report from Godrej Consumer Products - BSE: 532424, NSE: GODREJCP
YOU ARE HERE > MONEYCONTROL > MARKETS > PERSONAL CARE > AUDITORS REPORT - Godrej Consumer Products

Godrej Consumer Products

BSE: 532424|NSE: GODREJCP|ISIN: INE102D01028|SECTOR: Personal Care
SET ALERT
|
ADD TO PORTFOLIO
|
WATCHLIST
LIVE
BSE
Sep 27, 15:48
1609.35
8.7 (0.54%)
VOLUME 4,816
LIVE
NSE
Sep 27, 15:57
1613.10
8.45 (0.53%)
VOLUME 144,902
« Mar 15
Auditor's Report (Godrej Consumer Products) Year End : Mar '16
We have audited the accompanying standalone financial statements of
 GODREJ CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED(the Company), which comprise the
 Balance Sheet as at March 31, 2016, the Statement of Profit and Loss
 and the Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of
 significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
 
 Management''s Responsibility for the Standalone Financial Statements
 
 The Company''s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters in
 Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) with respect to
 the preparation of these standalone financial statements that give a
 true and fair view of the financial position, financial performance and
 cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles
 generally accepted in India, including the Accounting Standards
 specified under Section 133 of the Act, read with Rule 7 of the
 Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. This responsibility also includes
 maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the
 provision of the Act for safeguarding the assets of the Company and for
 preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and
 application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and
 estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design implementation
 and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls, that were
 operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the
 accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the
 financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from
 material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
 
 Auditor''s Responsibility
 
 Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone
 financial statements based on our audit.
 
 We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting
 and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in
 the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made
 thereunder.
 
 We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards on Auditing
 specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require
 that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit
 to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
 are free from material misstatement.
 
 An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
 the amounts and the disclosures in the financial statements. The
 procedures selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the
 assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
 statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
 assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant
 to the Company''s preparation of the financial statements that give a
 true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are
 appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the
 appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness
 of the accounting estimates made by the Company''s Directors, as well as
 evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
 
 We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
 appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone
 financial statements.
 
 Opinion
 
 In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
 explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone financial statements
 give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and
 give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
 generally accepted in India, of the state of affairs of the Company as
 at March 31, 2016 and its profit and its cash flows for the year ended
 on that date.
 
 Emphasis of Matter
 
 We draw attention to:
 
 Note 11(b) regarding the Scheme of Amalgamation of the erstwhile Godrej
 Household Products Limited with the Company approved by The Hon''ble
 High Court of Judicature at Bombay where by an amount of Rs.52.75 crore
 for the year ended March 31, 2016, equivalent to the amortization of
 the Goodknight and Hit Brands is directly debited to the General
 Reserve Account instead of debiting the same to the Statement of Profit
 and Loss as per the provisions of AS 26.The said accounting treatment
 is in accordance with the accounting treatment prescribed in the Order
 of the High Court of Mumbai dated February 28, 2011 under section 394
 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 
 Had this amount been charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss, the
 profit for the year ended March 31, 2016, would have been lower by Rs. 
 52.75 crore and the General Reserve would have been higher by Rs.52.75
 crore.
 
 Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
 
 Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
 
 1.  As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016 (the
 Order) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
 sub-section (11) of section 143 of the Act, we give in the Annexure A,
 a statement on the matters specified in the paragraph 3 and 4 of the
 Order.
 
 2.  As required by Section 143 (3) of the Act, we report that:
 
 a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations
 which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the
 purposes of our audit.
 
 b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
 kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those
 books.
 
 c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, and the Cash
 Flow Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the
 books of account.
 
 d) Except for the matters described in the Emphasis of Matter paragraph
 above, in our opinion, the aforesaid standalone financial statements
 comply with the Accounting Standards specified under Section 133 of the
 Act, read with Rule 7 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.
 
 e) On the basis of the written representations received from the
 directors as on March 31, 2016 taken on record by the Board of
 Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2016
 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164 (2) of the
 Act.
 
 f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls over
 financial reporting of the Company and the operating effectiveness of
 such controls, refer to our separate report in Annexure B.
 
 g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor''s
 Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors)
 Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and
 according to the explanations given to us:
 
 i.  The financial statements disclose the impact of pending litigations
 on the financial position of the Company – Refer Note 31 to the
 financial statements.
 
 ii.  The Company did not have any material foreseeable losses on long
 term contracts including derivative contracts requiring provision under
 the applicable law or accounting standards.  iii. There has been no
 delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the
 Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.
 
 Annexure A to the Independent Auditor''s Report
 
 Referred to in Para 1 ''Report on Other Legal and Regulatory
 Requirements'' in our Independent Auditors'' Report to the members of the
 Company on the standalone financial statements for the year ended March
 31, 2016.
 
 Statement on Matters specified in paragraphs 3 & 4 of the Companies
 (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2016:
 
 i) a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
 particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
 assets;
 
 b) As explained to us, the Company has a program for physical
 verification of fixed assets at periodic intervals.  In our opinion,
 the period of verification is reasonable having regard to the size of
 the Company and the nature of its assets.  The discrepancies reported
 on such verification are not material and have been properly dealt with
 in the books of account.
 
 c) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the
 basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the title deeds
 of immovable properties are held in the name of the Company.
 
 ii) The Management has conducted physical verification of inventory
 (excluding stocks lying with third parties) at reasonable intervals. In
 respect of inventory lying with third parties, these have substantially
 been confirmed by them. In our opinion, the frequency of verification
 is reasonable.  The discrepancies reported on such verification are not
 material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.
 
 iii) The Company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured, to
 companies, firms, limited liability partnerships or other parties
 listed in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies
 Act.  Accordingly, the provisions of sub-clause (a), (b) and (c) of
 paragraph 3 (iii) of the Order are not applicable.
 
 iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of
 section185and186 of the Act, with respect to investments made,
 guarantees given and securities provided.
 
 v) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposits from the public
 within the meaning of section 73 to 76, or any other relevant
 provisions of the Companies Act and the rules framed thereunder. No
 order has been passed by the Company Law Board, or National Company Law
 Tribunal, or Reserve Bank of India, or any Court, or any other
 Tribunal.
 
 vi) We have broadly reviewed the books of accounts and records
 maintained by the Company in respect of manufacture of products covered
 under the Rules made by the Central Government for maintenance of cost
 records, under section 148 (i) of the Companies Act, and are of the
 opinion that prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been
 made and maintained. We have not, however, made a detailed examination
 of the records with a view to determine whether they are accurate or
 complete.
 
 vii) a) According to the information and explanation given to us and
 the records examined by us, the Company is generally regular in
 depositing undisputed statutory dues, including dues pertaining to
 provident fund, Employees'' State Insurance, income- tax, sales-tax,
 wealth tax, service tax, duty of customs, duty of excise, value added
 tax, cess and any other statutory dues with the appropriate
 authorities, wherever applicable and there are no such outstanding dues
 as at March 31, 2016, for a period of more than six months from the
 date they became payable.
 
 b) According to the information and explanations given to us and the
 records of the Company examined by us, dues of income tax, sales tax,
 service tax, customs duty and excise duty not deposited on account of
 dispute are as follows:
 
                                     Amount 
 Name of 
 Statute   Nature of Dues                      Period  Forum where 
                                                       Dispute is
                                                       pending
 
                                     (Rs.)
 
 Central 
 Excise   Duty on one to one 
          correlation in terms of 1,912,132   2002-04  The Hon''ble 
                                                       Supreme Court of
                                                       India
 Act, 
 1944     excisable
          material purchased  
          and cleared final       3,651,495   2001-03  The Hon''ble
                                                       Supreme Court of
                                                       India
          product with 
          reference to the 
          said material
          wherein the benefit 
          under notification 
          No. 32 of 99 availed
 
          CENVAT credit 
          availed on Capital
          Goods                  1,755,920    2007-08  CESTAT, Chennai
 
                                    86,115    2002-03
 
          Advertisement
          Service- Credit
          availed as Input       2,837,962    2008-09  Commissioner of
                                                       Central Excise
                                                      (Appeals)
 
          Input Service Tax 
          Distribution Credit
          availed                3,219,974    2006-08  Commissioner of
                                                       Central Excise
                                                      (Appeals)
 
          Service Tax not
          paid on Royalty 
         (Foreign               40,751,895    2004-08  Commissioner of
                                                       Central Excise
          Payment)                                    (Appeals)
 
          Cenvat credit
          availed on goods
          received from         96,220,326    2007-08  CESTAT, Chennai
          Emox
 
          Valuation of 
          Soap Noodles 
          transferred from     233,090,754    2007-11  Commissioner of 
                                                       Central Excise
          Malanpur factory
          to Himachal
          Pradesh                                     (Appeals)
          factories
 
          Cenvat credit on
          input services
          availed based             815124    2007-12  CESTAT, Chennai
          on the invoices 
          issued by
          suppliers to the 
          branches prior to
          registration.
 
 Central 
 Excise   Allegations of 
          non- manufacturing
          of shoe               12,348,164    2007-12  CESTAT, Chennai
 Act, 
 1944     polish brush
 
          Valuation of 
          Mosquito Repellant 
          supplied from         82,960,761    2008-12  CESTAT, Kolkata
 
          Guwahati factories 
          to EmoxPuducherry
 
          Excise valuation
          dispute on account 
          of non-              103,600,000    1993-96  The Hon''ble 
                                                       Supreme Court of 
                                                       India
          compete fees and 
          trademark license  
          fees paid by PGG
         (JV between Godrej
          Soaps Limited and 
          Proctor and Gamble)
          to Godrej
 
          Distribution of 
          Cenvat Credit by 
          Head Office to       243,129,676    2008-12  Commissioner of
                                                       Central Excise
          Other Factories
 
          Valuation of Soap
          Noodles
          transferred from      63,703,682    2011-12  Commissioner of 
                                                       Central Excise
 
          Malanpur factory 
          to Himachal 
          Pradesh factories
 
          Valuation of PHD 
          - Differential 
          demand                78,976,342    2008-14  Commissioner of
                                                       Central Excise
          between Section 
          4 and 4A
          valuation
 
          Valuation of Combi
          pack which are
          marked as              3,045,410    2007-08  CESTAT, Chennai
         Goods for Export
 
 Central 
 Excise
          Violation of Target
          Plus Scheme of
          Customs                8,249,528    2007-08  CESTAT, Chennai
 Act, 
 1944
 
          CENVAT credit 
          availed on 
          Transportation           623,508    2011-12  Commissioner of
                                                       Central Excise
          Services                                    (Appeals), Kolkata
 
          CENVAT credit 
          availed on the 
          grounds of           14,7762,862    2008-13  CESTAT, Chennai
          valuation 
          methodology  
          adopted by one
          plant while
          transferring 
          goods from 
          Lokhra plant
 
          CENVAT credit 
          availed on 
          supplementary          2,228,424    2009-10  CESTAT, Chennai
          invoices issued 
          by GCPL to
          Emoxupon payment 
          of differential 
          duty by GCPL.
 
          CENVAT credit
          availed on 
          account of
          account               37,845,678    2009-12  CESTAT, Mumbai
          of trading  
          activity conducted
 
          CENVAT credit 
          availed on Capital 
          Goods                    940,000    2012-13  CESTAT, Kolkata
          because same is 
          not availed in the 
          month which it 
          pertains to
 
          Service Tax on
          Business Support 
          Service               37,552,534    2009-14  CESTAT, Kolkata
          provided by third
          party
 
          Cenvat Credit  
          disallowance on 
          outward                  225,200    2014-15  Commissioner of
                                                       Central Excise
          transportation                              (Appeals), Kolkata
 
                                    Amount 
 Name of 
 Statute  Nature of Dues                       Period  Forum where
                                                       Dispute is pending
 
                                     (Rs.)
 
          Utilisation of
          Cenvat credit to 
          pay Education         12,552,864    2010-15  Commissioner of 
                                                       Central Excise
 
          Cess and Higher 
          Education Cess
          demanded                                    (Appeals), Kolkata
          back by 
          authorities
 
          Others                   976,000    2007-08  CESTAT, New Delhi
 
                                   282,382    2008-09  CESTAT, Kolkata
 
                                   221,133    2003-04  Commissioner of 
                                                       Central Excise
                                                      (Appeals), Chennai
 
 Central 
 Sales 
 Tax       Sales Tax Dues 
           on account of 
           Classification       39,157,279    2007-09  Jaipur High Court
 Act, 1956 
 & Value   Head
 Added Tax 
 Act of
           Sales Tax and 
           Central Sales Tax 
           dues due to           1,268,683    2004-05  Uttar Pradesh 
                                                       Tribunal
 
 Various 
 States    enhancement of 
           turnover as per
           assessment
 
           Sales Tax Dues on
           account of
           Classification        6,340,450    2003-04  The Hon''ble 
                                                       Supreme Court of
                                                       India
           Head
 
                                              2004-05
 
                                              2005-06
 
           Central Sales  
           Tax Dues              6,600,000    2005-06  Deputy 
                                                       Commissioner
                                                      (Appeals)
 
           Sales Tax Dues
           for non submission
           of F Forms            2,252,275    2009-10  Kolkata Tribunal
           and non production
           of evidence 
           against sale
 
           Central Sales Tax
           Dues for non 
           submission            5,960,364    2009-10  Kolkata High
                                                       Court
           of F Forms and non
           production of
           evidence against
           sale
 
           Sales Tax and
           Central Sales Tax 
           Dues for non          3,974,477    2010-11  Kolkata Tribunal
           submission of F 
           Forms due to
           incorrect sale
           recording
 
           Sales Tax Dues on
           account of
           Classification       19,115,585    2001-06  Bihar Tribunal
           Head
 
           EMD/ LMD to be
           classified as
           electronic            1,799,870    2011-12  Assessing
                                                       Authority
           machines instead 
           of insecticide 
           as composite
           goods
 
           Sales Tax dues        1,336,189    2008-09, Bihar Appellate
                                                       Authority
                                              2011-12
 
           Entry Tax               370,953    2013-14  Appellate 
                                                       Authority
 
           Entry Tax             1,000,585    2005-08  Appellate
                                                       Authority
 
           Entry Tax             2,254,849    1999-00  Madhya Pradesh 
                                                       High Court
 
                                              2005-06
 
                                              2006-07
 
           Non submission 
           of C Forms            2,689,445    2012-13  Assessing Officer
 
           Differential
           tax on Nupur
           Mehndi being
           charged               4,797,847    2012-13  Madhya
                                                       Pradesh Tribunal
           at 13%
 
                                              2013-14
 
           Sales Tax Dues
           on account of 
           Classification       39,030,343    2005-06  
                                              to       Andhra Pradesh 
                                                       High Court
           Head                               2009-10
 
           Central Sales 
           Tax Dues                160,178    2004-05  Deputy 
                                                       Commissioner (A)
 
           Sales Tax demand
           for difference 
           in stock              1,406,850    2005-06  Deputy
                                                       Commissioner (A)
           inward rate
                                              2006-07
 
           Sales Tax Dues          958,784    2005-06  Appellate
                                                       Authority
                                              2006-07
 
           Sales Tax Dues        1,465,192    2005-06  Joint 
                                                       Commissioner (A)
 
           Central Sales
           Tax Dues                256,482    2005-06  Deputy 
                                                       Commissioner (A)
 
           Interest on
           Sales Tax Dues        1,207,000    2001-02  Chennai High
                                                       Court
 
           Sales Tax Dues          510,000    2002-03  Appellate
                                                       Authority
 
           Sales Tax Dues        1,757,925    2006-07  Joint 
                                                       Commissioner
                                                      (Appeals)
 
           Central Sales
           Tax demand for 
           non submission          670,000    2005-06  Appellate 
                                                       Authority, West
                                                       Bengal
           of F Forms & Others
 
                                              2006-07
 
                                    Amount
 Name of 
 Statute   Nature of Dues                      Period  Forum where
                                                       Dispute is
                                                       pending
 
                                    (Rs.)
 
 Central 
 Sales 
 Tax       Sales Tax Dues       10,641,000    2004-05  Appellate 
                                                       Revision Board
 Act, 
 1956 & 
 Value
           Sales Tax Dues
           on account of
           Classification        4,838,279    2008-09  Appellate
                                                       Authority 
 Added Tax 
 Act of    Head
 
 Various 
 States                                       2009-10
 
                                              2010-11
 
           Sales Tax Dues
           on account of
           Classification        9,044,088    2006-09  Andhra Pradesh 
                                                       High Court 
           Head
 
           Sales Tax Dues on
           account of
           Classification       25,809,827    2010-11  Andhra Pradesh 
                                                       High Court 
           Head
 
           Sales Tax demand
           due to mismatch
           in Returns           11,693,000    2006-07  Deputy 
                                                       Commissioner
           and Audit Report
 
           Sales Tax Dues
           due to difference 
           in Stock                394,000    2006-07  Bihar Tribunal 
           Transfer Invoice
           values
 
           Checkpost case        2,130,919    2010-11  Additional 
                                                       Commissioner 
                                                      (Appeals)
 
           Incorrect input
           tax credit claimed    3,073,427    2009-10  Assessing
                                                       Authority
 
           Sales Tax Dues on
           account of 
           Classification       82,808,362    2005-07  Appellate
                                                       Authority Head
 
           Central Sales Tax       399,606    2007-09  Orissa Tribunal
 
           Entry Tax             3,624,625    2007-08  Joint 
                                                       Commissioner
                                                       (Appeal)
 
                                              2011-13
 
           Sales Tax demands
           based on 
           Departmental          5,450,687    2007-09  Joint
                                                       Commissioner, 
                                                       Cuttack 
           Audit
 
           Sales Tax Dues on  
           account of
           Classification       12,408,219    2010-11  Orissa Tribunal 
           Head
 
           Sales Tax Dues on 
           account of
           Classification      163,072,773    2012-15  Deputy
                                                       Commissioner of
           Head                                        Commercial tax 
                                                      (Appeal)
 
           Central Sales Tax 
           Dues                     57,681    2011-12  Deputy
                                                       Commissioner
                                                      (Appeals),
                                                       Jaipur
 
           Sales Tax Dues on
           account of
           Classification          555,281    2013-14  Deputy
                                                       Commissioner
                                                      (Appeals),
                                                       Hyderabad
           Head
 
           Sales Tax Dues on
           account of 
           Classification        1,533,564    2011-13  Appellate
                                                       Authority 
                                                       Uttaranchal
           Head
 
           Sales Tax Dues on
           account of
           Classification        1,354,500    2014-15  Tribunal
                                                       Uttaranchal
           Head
 
           Other Sales Tax
           Dues                  3,316,753    1999-00 
                                              to       Uttar Pradesh,
                                                       High Court;
                                                       Appellate
                                              2009-10  Authority, Uttar
                                                       Pradesh; 
                                                       Appellate
                                                       Authority,
 
 Income 
 Tax Act,  Demand based on 
           the order of 
           regular                  11,020    AY 
                                              2007-08  High Court
 1961      assessment u/s
           143(3) of the  
           Act.
                                 1,082,401    AY 
                                              2010-11  Income - tax 
                                                       Appellate 
                                                       Tribunal
 
                                 7,331,795    AY 
                                              2011-12  Income - tax 
                                                       Appellate
                                                       Tribunal
 
           Income-tax in 
           dispute
           pertaining to 
           erstwhile            24,105,731    AY 
                                              2006-07  Income - tax 
                                                       Appellate
                                                       Tribunal
           Godrej Household 
           Products Limited.
                                   188,019    AY 
                                              2007-08  Commissioner 
                                                       of Income Tax (A)
 
                                14,416,939    AY 
                                              2008-09  Deputy 
                                                       Commissioner of
                                                       Income tax
 
                                40,426,135    AY 
                                              2009-10  Deputy 
                                                       Commissioner of
                                                       Income tax
 
 viii)According to the information and explanations given to us and
 based on the documents and records produced before us, there has been
 no default in repayment of loans or borrowings to financial
 institutions, banks or debenture holders. There were no loans or
 borrowings taken from the government during the year
 
 ix) According to the information and explanations given to us and the
 records examined by us, no moneys were raised either by way of initial
 public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments) or
 term loans by the Company during the year.
 
 x) Based upon the audit procedures performed by us, to the best of our
 knowledge and belief and according to the information and explanations
 given to us by the Management, no fraud on, or by the company, has been
 noticed or reported during the year.
 
 xi) According to the information and explanations give to us and based
 on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has
 paid/provided for managerial remuneration in accordance with the
 requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with
 Schedule V to the Act.
 
 xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, the Company is not a nidhi company. Accordingly,
 paragraph3(xii) of the Order is not applicable.
 
 xiii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
 based on our examination of the records of the Company, transactions
 with the related parties are in compliance with sections 177 and 188 of
 the Act where applicable and details of such transactions have been
 disclosed in the financial statements as required by the applicable
 accounting standards.
 
 xiv) According to the information and explanations give to us and based
 on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not
 made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully
 or partly convertible debentures during the year.
 
 xv) According to the information and explanations given to us and based
 on our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not
 entered into non- cash transactions with directors or persons connected
 with him. Accordingly, paragraph 3(xv) of the Order is not applicable.
 
 xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under section 45-IA
 of the Reserve Bank of India Act1934 and hence the provisions of
 paragraph 3(xvi) of the Order is not applicable.
 
                                             For KALYANIWALLA & MISTRY
 
                                                 Chartered Accountants 
 
                                         Firm Registration No. 104607W
 
 
 
                                                    Roshni R. Marfatia 
 
                                                               Partner
 
                                                        M. No.: 106548
 
 
 
                                                 Mumbai: May 03, 2016.
Source : Dion Global Solutions Limited
Quick Links for godrejconsumerproducts
Explore Moneycontrol
Stocks     A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Others
Mutual Funds     A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
Copyright © e-Eighteen.com Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduction of news articles, photos, videos or any other content in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of moneycontrol.com is prohibited.