1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of GAIL (India) Limited
as at 31st March, 2011, the Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement of the company for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We have conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the statement on the Companies (Auditor''s Report)
order,2003 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-
section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1 956, we enclose in
the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5
of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c) The Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and the
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
e) Disclosure in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section
274of the Companies Act, 1 956 is not required as per notification no.
GSR 829(E) dated October 21,2003 issued by the Department of Company
Affairs.
f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said financial statements read
together with the significant accounting policies and notes thereon
give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner
so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India:
i. in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2011;
ii. in the case of the Profit & Loss Account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
iii. in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flow of the
company for the year ended on that date.
The Annexure referred to in the auditor''s report to the shareholders of
GAIL (India) Limited for the year ended March 31,2011. We report that:
(i) (a) The company has generally maintained proper records showing
full particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) According to the information and explanation given to us, there is
a regular programme of verification of fixed assets which, in our
opinion, is reasonable having regard to the size of the company and the
nature of its assets. Fixed assets have been physically verified by the
management during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed
on such verification.
In our opinion, there was no substantial disposal of fixed assets
during the year.
(ii) The inventories have been physically verified at reasonable
intervals by the Management, except the stores & spares lying with
Engineers ndia Ltd. and other contractors. We have been explained that
the stock of gas at the end of the year has been taken with reference
to reading of Turbine Flow Meter/Gas Chromatograph installed at
Terminals, Stock of LPG/Pentane/SBP Solvent are determined with
reference to Tank Level Gauge measurement which are converted into
tonnage by measurement of density and applying correction factor for
temperature. LPG vapour volume is converted to tonnage by standard
formulae.
In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given
to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the Management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and nature of its business.
According to the information and explanations given to us, no material
discrepancies have been noticed on physical verification of inventories
as compared to the books and records.
(iii) The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans secured or
unsecured, to or from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(iv) In our opinion, and according to information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures to
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the
sale of goods and services.
(v) On the basis of our examination of the books of accounts, and as
per information and explanation given to us, the company has not made
any transactions in respect of any party during the financial year that
needs to be entered in the register pursuant to the section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
(vi) The company has not accepted any deposits from the public during
the year covered under section 58A and 58AA or any other relevant
provision of the Companies Act, 1 956.
(vii) In our opinion, the company''s internal audit system is
commensurate with its size and nature of its activities.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of Accounts maintained by the
Company pursuant to the order made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of Cost records under Section 209(1 )(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed
accounts and records have been maintained. We have not, however, made a
detailed examination of these records.
(ix) (a) According to the records of the company, the company is
generally regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including
Provident fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State
Insurance, Sales tax, Wealth tax, Service Tax, Custom duty, Excise
duty, cess and any other statutory dues with the appropriate
authorities. According to the information and explanation given to us,
no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Sales tax, Service Tax,
Custom duty, Excise duty and other statutory dues were outstanding at
the year end for a period of more than six months from the date they
become payable.
(b) As certified by the Management on which we have relied upon, the
dues of Excise Duty, Custom Duty, Entry Tax, Sales Tax and Other taxes
which have not been deposited on account of disputes and the forum
where the dispute is pending, are given below:
(Rs in Crores)
SI. Statute Subject Matter of Amount Period of Dispute
No. Dispute
1 Entry Tax (a) Entry Tax on
Market Value 300.58 1999-2008
of Natural Gas
instead of its
Purchase Price
(Including Interest)
(b) Rajasthan Entry
Tax Demand 0.65 2005-06
2 Sales Tax (a) Non-acceptance of
declaration form 0.16 1995-96 &
1996-97
for concessional
sales tax
(b) Sales Tax demand
as per assessment 3.00 2005-06 &
2006-07
order of 2005-06 and
2006-07
(c) CST demand on
Transmission charges 0.48 2005-06 and
2006-07
with penalty & interest
thereon
(d) Demand on account
of LPG subsidy 69.57 2006-2007
discount and treating
domestic LPG as
non-domestic
(e) Interest for delay
for sales tax
assessment 0.54 2003-2004
(f) Demand for non
submission of C Forms
and rejection of HPL
swap in transit sale 0.94 Apr. 2004 to
June 2004
3 Excise (a) LPG valuation
Dispute 15.04 Jan 2001 to
Feb 2005
(b) Dispute on
Pentane Classi
-fication 83.57 Mar. 2000 to
Feb 2002
& Aug.2005 to
Jul 2009
(c) Dispute on MFO
Classification 42.94 July 2004 to
May 2009
4 Service
Tax (a) Demand of
differential service
tax based 0.12 Oct.2006 to
Mar.2007
on returns for the
period from Oct 06 to
Mar 07
(b) Demand raised
denying refund claim 0.26 Sep.2007
allowed to GAIL for
service tax on
compression charges
(c) Demand raised by
denying Cenvat & 6.94 May 2005 to
Mar.2010
service tax credit
taken at Hazira
5 Other taxes Notified Area tax &
GIDC tax on revised 3.28 1985-86 to
2008-09
value, (incl. interest)
Statute Status - Forum
Entry Tax Allahabad High Court, Trade tax Tribunal &
Additional /Joint Commissioner-Appeals
Dy. Commissioner, Appeals, Kota
Sales Tax Additional Commissioner Appeals, Commercial Tax,
Gwalior
Additional Commissioner-Appeal Noida
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Joint Commissioner-Appeals, Vadodara
Dy. Commissioner, Sales Tax, Mumbai
Appellate & Revisional Bench, West Bengal
Excise CESTAT Mumbai
CESTAT New Delhi & CESTAT Ahmedabad
CESTAT Ahemda bad CESTAT Ahemda bad
CESTAT Ahemdabad
CESTAT Ahemda bad
Other Taxes Ahmedabad High Court
(x) The company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the current and
immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedure and on the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
institution, bank and debenture holders.
(xii) In our opinion, the company has not granted loans and advances on
the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities other than to its employees. In our opinion, the company has
maintained adequate documents and records in respect of such loans.
(xiii) The company is not a chit fund, nidhi, mutual benefit fund or a
society. Accordingly, clause 4(xiii) of the order not applicable.
(xiv) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments. Accordingly, clause 4 (xiv) of the order is not
applicable.
(xv) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks and financial institutions during the year.
(xvi) On the basis of review of utilization of funds pertaining to term
loans on overall basis and related information as made to us, the term
loans taken by the company have been utilized for the purposes for
which they are obtained.
(xvii) According to the information and explanation given to us,
company has not raised any short term loan during the year.
(xviii) The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company has issued debentures(bonds) during the year.
According to information and explanations given to us, the Company has
created necessary charges as per debenture (bond) trust deed in respect
of debentures(bonds) issued during the year.
(xx) During the year no money has been raised by public issues.
(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the
year.
For M.L Puri & Co. For Rasool Singhal & Co.
Chartered Accountants Chartered Accountants
Firm No:002312N Firm No.: 500015 N
Navin Bansal Anil Gupta
Partner Partner
Membership No. 91922 Membership No. 072767
Place : New Delhi Place: New Delhi
Dated : May 23,2011 Dated : May 23,2011
|