1. We have audited the annexed Balance Sheet of FORTIS MALAR HOSPITALS
LTD (the Company) as on 31st March 2011, and also the Profit and Loss
Account and the Cash flow statement of the Company for the year ended
on 31st March 2011 and annexed thereto.
2. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
Management. Our Responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
3. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material mis- statement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
4. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) order, 2003, issued
by Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) Section 227 of the
Companies Act, 1956, we enclose an annexure which is a statement of the
matters specified in paragraph 4 and 5 of the said order.
Further to our comments in the annexure referred to above, we report
that
a. We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examinations of
those books.
c. The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and the Cash flow
statement dealt with by the report are in agreement with the books of
accounts.
d. In our opinion the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies
Act, 1956.
e. On the Basis of written representation received from the directors,
as on 31st March 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we
report that none of the directors, as on 31st March 2011, is
disqualified from being appointed as a director in terms of Section
274(1) (g) of the Companies Act, 1956
f. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, read together with the notes thereon give
the information required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so
required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India:
i. In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March 2011;
ii. In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit for the
year ended on that date; and
iii. In the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the Cash Flow for the year
ended on that date.
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH (4) OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE
I) The Company is in the process of updating the fixed assets register.
The Company has a regular programme of verification of fixed asset
which in our opinion is reasonable having regard to the size of the
Company and the nature of its assets. According to the information and
explanations given to us, in accordance with this programme a section
of the fixed assets have been physically verified by the management
during the current period, no material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification. Removal of obsolete and irrepairable assets having
a original cost Rs. 59,331,032, as explained in the note No. 10 of
Schedule No. 15 has not affected the going concern concept.
ii) a) The inventory of consumable stores have been verified by the
management. In our opinion the frequency of verification is reasonable
b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable in relation to the size of the company
and nature of its business.
c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed during verification between physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
iii) The Company has taken unsecured loans from one company covered in
the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956.
The maximum amount involved during the period was Rs 194.59 lakhs and
the year end balance was Rs.. NIL. The loan has been repaid in the
financial year. In our opinion and according to the information and
explanation given to us the rate of interest is not prejudicial to the
interest of the Company.
iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchase of fixed assets and sale of
products/services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed
any weaknesses in internal controls.
v) a) According to the information and explanations . given to us the
transactions that need to be entered into a register in pursuance of
section 301 of the Act have been so entered,
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the
Companies Act 1956, and exceeding Rs. 5.00 lakhs in respect of any
party during the period, have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time
vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not accepted deposits from the public.
vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its • business.
viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central
Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause
(d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for
the products/services of the Company.
ix) a) Except the Service tax covered in the note 12 of Schedule 15,
undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Income-tax, Cess
and other material statutory dues have generally been regularly
deposited during the period with the appropriate authorities. The
Company has delayed the remittance of service tax . The arrears of
service tax outstanding for more than six months as at the last day of
financial year is Rs. 10.95 lakhs.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
disputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales
tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess were in arrears, as at 31st
March 2011 for a period of more than six months from the date on which
they are payable.
x) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, accumulated losses at the end of the current period are
less than fifty percent of the net worth.
xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any financial
institutions, bank or debenture holders.
xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of
shares, debentures and other securities.
xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended)
are not applicable to the Company.
xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.
xv) According to the information and explanations given to us the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which
they were raised
xvii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the short-term funds were raised by the Company and were
not utilised for repayment of long-term loans.
xviii) The Company has not made preferential allotment of shares during
the period. Hence the provisions of clause 4(1) (viii) are not
applicable.
xix) The company has not issued debentures during the period. Hence
provisions of clause 4(1)(ix) are not applicable.
xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
period. Hence provisions of clause 4(1) (xx) are not applicable.
xxi) To the best of our knowledge and belief, and according to the
information and explanations given to us, no fraud on or by the Company
has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.
for K. Gopalan & Co
Chartered Accountants
Firms Registration No.000975S
S.N.Parthasarathy
Partner
Membership No. 20168
Place : Chennai
Date : 16th May, 2011
|