We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Indo Asian Fusegear
Limited as at 31st March 2011, the Profit and Loss Account and also the
Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued by
the Central Government in terms of section 227 (4A>of the Companies
Act, 1956, and on the basis of such checks as we considered appropriate
and according to the information and explanations given to us, we
enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in
paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order to the extent applicable.
Further to ourcomments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph above,
we report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit.
b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company, so far as appears from our examination of those
books.
c) The Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account.
d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and the
Cash Flow Statement are in compliance with the mandatory Accounting
Standards, referred to in Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956,
to the extent applicable.
e) On the basis of the written representations received from the
Directors, as on 31st March 2011 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the Directors is disqualified as on
31st March 2011 from being appointed as a Director in terms of clause
(g) of sub section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts together with the notes
thereon and attached thereto give the information required by the
Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India:
i) in the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the company
as at 31st March 2011; ii) in the case of Profit and Loss Account, of
the profit forthe year ended on that date; and iii) in the case of Cash
Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditors Report on the accounts of Indo Asian Fusegear
Limited for the year ended 31st March, 2011 as referred to in paragraph
3 of our report of even date
(I) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) The fixed assets have been physically verified by the management at
the year-end. We are informed that no material discrepancies have been
noticed by the management on such verification as compared with the
record of fixed assets maintained by the Company.
(c) Consequent upon the slump sale of its Switchgear business as stated
in Note No. 23 of Schedule 18 of the Notes on Accounts, the Company has
sold its fixed assets at Murthal (excluding Land and Building ), Noida
and Haridwar during the year covered by our report. According to the
information & explanations given to us, the company has identified
business opportunities which are futuristic in technology and have
substantial growth prospects and where the available funds would be
deployed. In view of the above, the going concern status of the company
is not affected.
(ii) (a) The inventory (excluding stocks with third parties) has been
physically verified by the management during the year. In respect of
inventories lying with the third parties, these have substantially been
confirmed by them. In our opinion frequency of verification is
reasonable.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of the inventory followed
by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to size of
the Company and nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stock and
the book records were not material and have been properly dealt with in
the books of account.
(iii) (a) The Company has not granted any loan, secured or unsecured,
to companies, firms or other parties in the register maintained under
Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, clause 3(b), (c)
and (d) of the Order are not applicable to the Company for the current
year. (b) The Company has not taken any loan, secured or unsecured,
from companies, firms or other parties covered in the register
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly,
clause 3(f) and (g)of the Order are not applicable to the Company for
the current year.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the sale of
goods. The Company has not undertaken any service activity during the
year. Further, in our opinion, there is no continuing failure to
correct major weaknesses in internal control.
(v) According to the information and explanations given to us, there
have been no contracts or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 during the year to be entered in the register
maintained under that section. Accordingly commenting on transactions
made in pursuance of such contracts or arrangements does not arise.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not accepted deposits from the public
during the year within the meaning of Sec 58A & 58AA or any other
relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed
thereunder.
(vii) The Company has an internal audit system commensurate with its
size and nature of its business.
(viii) On the basis of the records produced, we are of the opinion
that, prima facie, the cost accounting records prescribed by the
Central Government under section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956
in respect of CFL and Wire units have been maintained by the Company.
However, we are not required to and have not carried out any detailed
examination of such records.
(ix) (a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with
appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including Provident
Fund, Investor Education Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance,
Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Excise Duty, Custom
Duty and other statutory dues applicable to it and there are no
undisputed liabilities as on 31st March 2011 outstanding for a period of
more than six months from the date they became payable.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
particulars of dues of Excise Duty matters as at 31st March 2011 which
have not been deposited on account of any dispute are as follows:
Nature of Demand in Amount deposited Period to which
Dues Dispute (Rs.) (Rs.) amount relates
Excise Duty 1,810,652 515,000 August, 1998 to
including Penalty December, 1998
Excise Duty 10,450,866 2,500,000 2007-2008
including Penalty
Excise Duty 39,484,604 - May, 2004 to
including
Penalty September, 2004
Excise Duty 568,024 - April, 2001 to
including Penalty August, 2004
Total 52,314,146 3,015,000
Nature of Dues Forum where pending
Excise Duty
including Penalty Central Excise and Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi
Excise Duty
including Penalty Central Excise and Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi
Excise Duty
including Penalty Central Excise and Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi
Excise Duty
including Penalty Central Excise and Service Tax
Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi
Total
(x) The Company has no accumulated losses as at March 31,2011. The
Company has not incurred cash losses in the financial year ended on
that date and in the immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a financial
institution or bank.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion and according to information and explanations
given to us, the provisions of any special statute applicable to chit
fund, nidhi, mutual benefit fund, societies are not applicable to the
Company. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the Companies
(Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.
(xiv) The Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4
(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not
applicable to the Company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given Corporate guarantees of Saudi Riyals Five Million
Five Thousand only to The Saudi British Bank, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and
Saudi Riyals Three Million Two Hundred Thousand only to Saudi
Industrial Development Fund for securing the banking facilities
extended by it to M/s Saudi National Lamps and Electricals Company
Limited, a Joint Venture Company in which the Company is having 20%
ownership interest. The terms and conditions thereof are not
prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, on an
overall basis, term loans have been applied for the purpose for which
they were obtained.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us, and
on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, we are
of the opinion that the Company has not utilized any funds raised from
short-term sources towards long-term investments.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has made preferential allotment of shares to parties covered in
the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
In our opinion, the price at which shares have been issued is not
prejudicial to the interest of the company.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
(xx) The Company has not made any public issue during the year.
(xxi) During the course of examination of the books and records of the
Company, carried out in accordance with the Generally Accepted Auditing
Practices in India, and according to the information and explanation
given to us, we have neither come across any instance of fraud on or by
the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor have we been
informed of such case by the management.
Rajesh Sethi
Partner
M. No. 85669
Firm Reg. No: 001111N
For and on behalf of
Place : Noida J C Bhalla & Co.
Dated: 19th April, 2011 Chartered Accountants
|