1 We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of D.S. Kulkarni
Developers Limited as at the 31st March 2011, the Profit and Loss
Account and also the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year
ended on that date, both annexed thereto. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company''s Management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audit.
2 We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3 As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003, and the
Companies (Auditor''s Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004, issued by the
Central Government of India in terms of Section 227(4A) of the
Companies Act, 1956, we enclose, on the basis of our opinion, our
examination of the relevant records and according to the information
and explanations given to us, in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purposes of
our audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company, so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement of the Company dealt with by this Report are in agreement
with the books of account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of the written representation received from the
directors as at 31st March, 2011, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we do hereby certify that none of the directors of the
Company as on 31st March 2011is disqualified under Section 274(1) (g)
of the Companies Act, 1956 on the said date for being appointed as a
director in the aforesaid Company;
(vi) We cannot, as required by S.227(3)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956,
state whether the cess payable u/s 441A of the Companies Act, 1956, has
been paid and, if not, the details of the amount of cess not so paid
because the Central Government has not, till the date of this report,
notified u/s 441A(1) the amount of cess payable u/s 441A(2) and has not
specified u/s 441A(4) the manner in which the said cess is to be paid.
(vii) In our opinion, to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts, read with the notes
thereon, give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in
the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at the 31st March 2011;
b) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date and
c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
Annexure Referred to in Paragraph 3 of Our Report of Even Date on the
Accounts of D.S. Kulkarni Developers Limited For the Year Ended 31st
March 2011.
(i) (a) The company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) All the assets have not been physically verified by the management
during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which
is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature
of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification.
(c) The contents of Paragraph 4(i)(c) of CARO, 2003 are not applicable
since the company has not disposed of a substantial part of its fixed
assets.
(ii) (a) Physical verification of inventory has been conducted by the
management at reasonable intervals during the year.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared
to the book records were not material and have been properly dealt with
in the books of account.
(iii) (a) The company has not granted loans, secured or unsecured, to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act.
(b) The company has not taken loans, secured or unsecured, from
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Act.
(iv) There are adequate internal control system commensurate with the
size of the company and the nature of its business, for the purchase of
inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of real estate, goods and
services. We have not observed any continuing failure to correct major
weaknesses in internal control system.
(v) (a) The transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements, that need to be entered into the register maintained
under Section 301, of the Companies Act, 1956 have been recorded in the
register;
(b) The transactions referred to under sub clause (a) above, which
exceed Rs. 5,00,000/- in each case have been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the
relevant time.
(vi) The Company has complied with the provisions of Section 58A,
Companies Act, 1956, and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules,
1975 and the Reserve Bank of India Directives in the matter of
acceptance of deposits from the public. No order has been passed by the
Company Law Board in this regard.
(vii) The company has an internal audit system, which, in our opinion,
is commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
(viii) Maintenance of cost records has not been prescribed by the
Central Government under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 209
of the Companies Act, 1956.
(ix) (a) The company is generally regular in depositing undisputed
statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and
Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Sales-tax, Wealth Tax,
Service tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, cess and other statutory dues
with the appropriate authorities.
(b) There are no disputed amounts outstanding in respect of Sales Tax /
Wealth tax / Service tax / Customs Duty / Excise Duty / Cess as at the
last day of the Financial year. The disputed amounts in respect of
Income tax are as follows
Sr. Amount in Assessment
Forum where dispute is pending
Rs. Lacs Year
1 22.25 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 2004-05
2 10.00 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 2005-06
3 7.14 Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 2006-07
4 197.80 Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 2007-08
5 209.44 Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 2008-09
446.63
(x) The company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
period and has not incurred any cash losses during the period and in
the preceding year.
(xi) The company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any
financial institution or bank. The company has no debenture holders.
(xii) The company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities
and therefore the question of maintenance of documents and records in
respect thereof does not arise.
(xiii) The company is not a chit fund, nidhi, mutual benefit / society.
(xiv) The company is not dealing in shares, debentures and other
securities and hence the question of maintenance of proper records of
the transactions and contracts does not arise.
(xv) The company has given guarantee of Rs. 108.84 crores for a loan
taken by its subsidiary.
(xvi) During the year under review the company has applied the term
loans obtained during the period for the purpose for which the said
loans were obtained
(xvii) During the year under review the company has not used for long
term investment the funds raised on short term basis.
(xviii) During the year under review, the company has not made
preferential allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in
the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The company has no debentures.
(xx) During the year under review the company has not raised any money
by public issue.
(xxi) During the year under review no fraud on or by the Company has
been noticed or reported.
For Gokhale, Tanksale & Ghatpande
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No. 103277W
S. M. Ghatpande
Partner
Membership No. 30462
Place : Pune.
Date : 10th May, 2011
|