1.  We have audited the attached balance sheet of DIL Limited (''the
 Company'') as at March 31, 2011 and also the profit and loss account and
 the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed
 thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
 Company''s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
 these financial statements based on our audit.
 
 2.  We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
 generally accepted in India.  Those Standards require that we plan and
 perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
 financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
 includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
 and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
 assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
 by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
 presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
 our opinion.
 
 3.  As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as
 amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
 sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 (''the Act''),
 we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in
 paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
 
 4.  Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
 report that:
 
 i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
 best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
 audit;
 
 ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
 been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
 those books;
 
 iii.  The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow
 statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
 account;
 
 iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash
 flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
 standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
 Companies Act, 1956.
 
 v. On the basis of the written representations received from the
 directors, as on March 31, 2011, and taken on record by the Board of
 Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
 March 31, 2011 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
 (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
 
 vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
 the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
 required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
 a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
 generally accepted in India;
 
 a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
 Company as at March 31, 2011;
 
 b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the
 year ended on that date; and
 
 c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
 ended on that date.
 
 Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date Re: DIL
 Limited (''the Company'')
 
 (i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
 particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
 assets.
 
 (b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during
 the year and no material discrepancies were identified on such
 verification.
 
 (c) There was no disposal of a substantial part of fixed assets during
 the year.
 
 (ii) The nature of the business of the Company is such that it does not
 have inventory in tangible form. Accordingly, the provisions of clause
 4 (ii) of the Companies (Auditor''s report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are
 not applicable to the Company.
 
 (iii) (a) The Company has granted loans to two companies covered in the
 register maintained under section 301 of the Act. The maximum amount
 involved during the year was Rs. 1157.50 lakhs and the balance of loans
 granted to such parties at the end of the year was Rs. 257.50 lakhs.
 
 (b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for
 such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the
 Company.
 
 (c) In respect of loans granted, repayment of the principal amount is
 as stipulated and payment of interest have been regular.
 
 (d) There is no overdue amount of loans granted to companies, firms or
 other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of
 the Act.
 
 (e) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
 has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or
 other parties covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
 the Companies Act, 1956. Accordingly, the provisions of clause
 4(iii)(e) to (g) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as
 amended) are not applicable to the Company and hence not commented
 upon.
 
 (iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
 with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
 purchase of fixed assets and for rendering of services. The activities
 of the Company do not involve purchase of inventory and the sale of
 goods. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any major
 weakness or continuing failure to correct any major weakness in the
 internal control system of the Company in respect of these areas.
 
 (v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the
 management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or
 arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Act that need to be
 entered into the register maintained under section 301 have been so
 entered.
 
 (b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
 given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
 arrangements and exceeding the value of Rupees five lakhs have been
 entered into during the financial year at prices which are reasonable
 having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time
 except in respect of sale of technology to a subsidiary being of the
 unique and specialized nature where comparable prices were not
 available, we are unable to comment whether the transactions was made
 at prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
 
 (vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
 
 (vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
 commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
 
 (viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central
 Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause
 (d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Act for the products of
 the Company.
 
 (ix) (a) The Company is regular in depositing with appropriate
 authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,
 investor education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance,
 income-tax, sales- tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
 duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it.
 
 Further, since the Central Government has till date not prescribed the
 amount of cess payable under section 441 A of the Companies Act,1956,
 we are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of
 the company in depositing the same.
 
 (b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
 undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor
 education and protection fund, employees'' state insurance, income-tax,
 wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and
 other undisputed statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for
 a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
 
 (c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of
 income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
 duty and cess on account of any dispute, are as follows:
 
 Name of the          Nature of          Amount      Period to which
 statute              dues              (Rs. in      the amount 
                                          Lakhs)     relates
 
 The Bombay           Sales Tax           99.67*     1995-96
 Sales Tax Act
 
 The Gujarat Sales    Tax                  4.63      1992 to 1994
 Sales Tax Act        and Penalty
 
 Central              Excise Duty         67.21      1992 to 1994
 Excise Act,          and Penalty
 1944
 
 Central              Service tax         15.00      2000-2001
 Excise Act,          and Penalty
 
 
 Name of the          Forum where
 statute              dispute is 
                      pending
 
 The Bombay Sales     High Court,     
 Sales Tax Act        Bombay
 
 The Gujarat Sales    Sales Tax Appellate                   
 Sales Tax Act        Tribunal       
 
 Central              Commissioner of            
 Excise Act,          Central Excise           
 1944                 Appeals, Daman
                 
 Central              Customs, Excise &             
 Excise Act,          Service Tax
 1944                 Appellate Tribunal
 
 * Company has paid the same under protest
 
 (x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
 year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately
 preceding financial year.
 
 (xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
 explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
 Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks. The Company
 has no outstanding dues to a financial institution or debenture
 holders.
 
 (xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
 based on the documents and records produced before us, the Company has
 not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of
 pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
 
 (xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
 mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
 4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are
 not applicable to the Company.
 
 (xiv) In respect of dealing/trading in shares, securities, debentures
 and other investments, in our opinion and according to the information
 and explanations given to us, proper records have been maintained of
 the transactions and contracts and timely entries have been made
 therein. The shares, securities, debentures and other investments have
 been held by the Company, in its own name.
 
 (xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
 Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
 or financial institutions.
 
 (xvi) Based on information and explanations given to us by the
 management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans
 were obtained.
 
 (xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
 an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
 that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
 investment.
 
 (xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
 to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
 section 301 of the Act.
 
 (xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
 year.
 
 (xx) The Company has not raised any money through public issue during
 the year.
 
 (xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
 reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
 the information and explanations given by the management, we report
 that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
 the year.
 
 For S. R. BATLIBOI & ASSOCIATES 
 Firm Registration No. 101049W 
 Chartered Accountants
 
 per Vikram Mehta 
 Partner
 
 Membership No.: 105938
 Place : Mumbai 
 Date  : May 28, 2011