Dalmia Cement (Bharat)
BSE: 500097 | NSE: DALMIACEM | ISIN: INE495A01022 | Cement - Major
- Directors Report
- Chairman's Speech
- Auditors Report
- Notes To Accounts
- Accounting Policy
- Finished Products
- Raw Materials
| Auditor's Report | Year End : Mar '09 |
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of DALMIA CEMENT
(BHARAT) LIMITED, as at 31st March, 2009, and also the Profit and Loss
account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date,
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 as
amended by the Companies (Auditors’ Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
(collectively the Order) issued by the Central Government of India in
terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956 and
on the basis of such checks of the books and records of the Company as
we considered appropriate and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purposes of
our audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on 31st March, 2009 and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March,
2009 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-
section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with
Significant Accounting Policies and Notes to Accounts give the
information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so
required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2009;
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss account, of the Profit for the
year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditors Report
Re: Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited
Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date
1. The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
2. As explained to us, all the fixed assets have not been physically
verified by the management during the year but there is a regular
programme of verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having
regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No
material discrepancies were noticed on such physical verification.
3. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, a substantial part of fixed assets has not been disposed
off by the Company during the year.
4. As explained to us, physical verification has been conducted by the
management at reasonable intervals in respect of finished goods, stores
and spare parts and raw material. Further, stock in the possession and
custody of third parties and stock in transit at 31st March, 2009 have
been verified by the management with reference to confirmation or
statement of accounts or correspondence of the third parties or
subsequent receipts of goods. In our opinion, the frequency of such
verification is reasonable.
5. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
6. On the basis of our examination of the records of inventories, in
our opinion, the Company has maintained proper records of inventories
and as explained to us, the discrepancies noticed on physical
verification of inventories as compared to book records were not
material and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.
7. The Company has not granted or taken any loans, secured or
unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
8. Since there are no such loans, the comments regarding repayment of
the principal amount and interest due thereon and overdue amounts are
not required.
9. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. Further, on the basis of our examination of the books and
records of the Company,
carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing
practices in India, we have neither come across nor have we been
informed of any instance of a continuing failure to correct major
weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control systems.
10. Based on the audit procedures applied by us and according to the
information and explanations provided by the management, we are of the
opinion that particulars of transactions that need to be entered into
the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956
have been so entered.
11. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions with parties, with whom transactions
exceeding the value of Rupees Five Lacs in respect of each party have
been entered into during the financial year, are at prices, which are
reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the
relevant time where such market prices are available.
12. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of sections
58A, 58AA and any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956
and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard to
the deposits accepted from the public.
13. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
14. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the Order made by the Central Government of India
for the maintenance of cost records under section 209(1) (d) of the
Companies Act, 1956, in respect of the cement and sugar units and are
of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed accounts and records
have been made and maintained. However, we are not required to carry
out a detailed examination of such records.
15. According to the records of the Company examined by us and the
information and explanations given to us, in our opinion, the Company
is regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed
statutory dues including provident fund, investor education and
protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax, sales-tax,
service tax, wealth-tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other
statutory dues applicable to it and there are no such undisputed dues
payable as at 31st March, 2009 for a period of more than six months
from the date they became payable.
16. According to the records of the Company examined by us and the
information and explanations given to us, there are no dues of service
tax, customs duty and wealth tax which have not been deposited on
account of any dispute, except the following in respect of disputed
excise duty, sales tax, income tax and cess along with forum where
dispute is pending:
Name of the Statute Nature of Dues Amount
Rs. Millions
Central Excise Act, 1944 Disallowance of 7.23
Cenvat Credit
Central Excise Act, 1944 Disallowance of 48.72
Cenvat Credit on
Capital Goods
Central Excise Act, 1944 Disallowance of 1.33
Cenvat Credit
Central Excise Act, 1944 Denial of cenvat credit 9.47
on clinker used in
cement supplied to
Special Economic units
in zones
Tamil Nadu General Sales Differential tax for non 0.77
Tax Act, 1959 acceptance of Form
XVII for purchase
Kerala General Sales Assessment demand 6.85
Tax Act, 1963 addl. 1% on turnover
Kerala General Sales Incorrect filing of monthly 9.11
Tax Act, 1963 returns
Mines and Minerals Royalty on Patta Lands 2.77
(Regulation & Development)
Act, 1957
Coal Mines (Conservation Cess Charges 1.28
& Development) Act, 1974
Tamil Nadu Electricity Taxation on consumption 13.44
(Taxation on Consumption) of self-generated energy
Act, 1962 using Furnace Oil as fuel
Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax 8.00
Period to which the Forum where
amount relates dispute is pending
Oct. 01 to Apr. ‘02 CESTAT, Southern
Region Bench
Sept. 04 to Feb. ‘06 CESTAT, Southern
Regional Bench
Apr07 to Mar08 Commissioner Central
Excise(Appeals)
July 06 to Oct’ 07 Commissioner Central
Excise(Appeals)/CESTAT
1997-98, 1998-99 & STAT, Madurai
1999-00
2003-04, 2004-05 Dy. Commissioner (App.),
Ernakulam.
2005-06 High Court of Kerala
30.05.1982 to Supreme Court of India
31.12.1991
April 2005 Dy. Commissioner,Customs
Oct’92 to Sep’99 High Court, Madras
A/Y 2006-07 Commissioner of Income
Tax (Appeals),New Delhi
17. The Company does not have accumulated losses as at the close of
the financial year. The Company has not incurred any cash losses during
the financial year covered by our audit and the immediately preceding
financial year.
18. According to the records of the Company examined by us and the
information and explanations given to us, in our opinion, the Company
has not defaulted in repayment of dues to any financial institution,
bank or debenture holders during the year.
19. In our opinion and according to the explanations given to us and
based on the information available, no loans and advances have been
granted by the Company on the basis of security by way of pledge of
shares, debentures and other securities.
20. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund/nidhi/ mutual
benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of
clause (xiii) of paragraph 4 of the Order are not applicable to the
Company.
21. The Company has maintained proper records of the transactions and
contracts in respect of dealing or trading in shares, securities,
debentures and other investments and timely entries have been made
therein. All shares, securities, debentures and other investments have
been held by the Company in its own name.
22. In our opinion, the terms and conditions on which the Company has
given guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial
institutions are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the
Company.
23. According to the records of the Company examined by us and the
information and explanations given to us, in our opinion, the term
loans taken by the Company have been applied for the purpose for which
they were obtained, where such end-use has been stipulated by the
lender.
24. According to the information and explanations given to us and on
the basis of an overall examination of the balance sheet of the
Company, in our opinion, generally, there are no funds raised by the
Company on short-term basis which have been used for long-term
investment.
25. During the year, the Company has not made any preferential
allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
26. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has created necessary security for debentures issued during the
year and in earlier years.
27. During the period covered by our audit report, the Company has not
raised any money by public issue.
28. During the course of our examination of the books and records of
the Company carried out in accordance with the generally accepted
auditing practices in India, we have neither come across any instance
of fraud on or by the Company, noticed or reported during the year, nor
have we been informed of such case by the management.
29. The other clauses of the Order do not appear to be applicable for
the year under report.
For S.S. KOTHARI MEHTA & CO.
Chartered Accountants
(ARUN K. TULSIAN)
Place: New Delhi Partner
Date: 28th May, 2009 Membership No. 89907 |
|
![]() | |
| Source : Religare Technova | |
![]() | |




Online










