1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Cranes Software
International Limited as at 31st March 2010, the Profit and Loss
Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date,
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. The attached Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2010 is drawn on the
basis of the Principle of Going Concern. We opine as follows in this
connection :
i) A Principal supplier of the company The Mathworks Inc. has filed a
petition for Winding up of the company u/s.434 of the Companies Act,
1956 before the High Court of Karnataka for non-payment of dues.
ii) The Trustees of Foreign Currency Convertible Bond holders due for
redemption in March, 2011 have served a legal notice on the Company for
non-payment of interest due on the Bonds from September, 2009 and
stated that a Petition u/s.434 for winding up of the company would be
filed in the event of non-payment of interest.
iii) The company has also received several legal notices from creditors
and employees for non- payment of dues to them.
iv) The security provided to Banks and other lending institutions is
not adequate to cover the amounts outstanding as appearing in the
Balance Sheet.
v) The Company has incurred a cash loss of Rs. 220.08 Crore for the
year under review
vi) There has been a considerable erosion of staff strength for the
year under review
vii The ability of the company to recover the book debts/trade advances
representing substantial part of these assets shown in the Balance
Sheet particularly in the absence of confirmation of balances and any
tangible evidence for follow up of collection
viii) The company has not carried out the exercise of assessing the
value of intangible assets appearing in the books with a view to
provide for any impairment
vix) There are several cases filed u/s.138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act against the company
x) Some Banks and lending institutions have applied the DRT for review
of dues and provisions of SARFAESI have also been invoked against the
company
In the light of the above, we are unable to give an opinion on the
reasonableness and applicability of the principle of Going Concern.
Nevertheless, in the absence of any conclusive evidence to indicate the
contrary, the statements are prepared based on the principles of Going
Concern and our opinion is based on the same as well.
4. Further to the above, we additionally opine as follows :
i) The company has defaulted in discharge of undisputed statutory dues
like Provident Fund, ESI, VAT, Income Tax, including Tax deducted at
source and Dividend Tax and Service Tax.
ii) Non provision for the book debts to the extent of Rs.319.84 Crore
and Rs. 234.44 Crore on account of the advances, which in the auditors
opinion is doubtful.
iii) Recognition of Deferred Tax asset in respect of the carried
forward losses to the extent of Rs.102 Crore, in the absence of any
reasonable certainty of future taxable income
iv) Non payment of dividend declared in the Annual General meeting held
on 29th September 2009 for the FY ending 31st March 2009.
v) As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003, as
amended by the Companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment) order, 2004
issued by Government of India in terms of sub- section (4A) of section
227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement
on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
6. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
i) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
iii) the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
iv) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
v) on the basis of written representations, as on 31st March 2010 and
taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of the
Directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2010 from being appointed as
a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
vi) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, subject to Para nos ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) above
the said accounts give the information required by the Companies Act,
1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in
conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March 2010;
(b) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the loss of the
Company for the year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date)
(i) (a) The Company has generally maintained records showing
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets. During the year, there have been a large number of movements of
such Fixed Assets amongst locations; these movements and the
consequential impact are yet to be comprehensively reflected in the
above records.
(b) The Fixed Assets have generally been physically verified by the
management during the year.
(c) The Company has not disposed off substantial part of fixed assets
during the year and therefore do not affect the going concern
assumption on this account.
(ii) (a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by
the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
(iii) The Company has not granted/taken any loans, secured or
unsecured, to/from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. In
view of the above, clause 4 (iii) (b), (c), (d), (f) and (g) of the
said order are not applicable.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with
regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our
audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major
weaknesses in the internal control system.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the particulars of all contracts and
arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act 1956 have
been entered in the register required to be maintained under that
section.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the contracts and arrangements entered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been made
at prices which are reasonable having regard to the prevailing market
prices at the relevant time.
(vi) The company has not accepted any deposit from the public and as
such the provisions of clause 4(vi) of the said Order are not
applicable.
(vii) In our opinion, the company has an in house internal audit system
which needs to be further streamlined to render it commensurate with
the size and nature of its business.
(viii) The Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of
cost records as required under clause
(d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company was yet to deposit undisputed statutory dues including,
Provident Fund, Employees state Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax,
Service Tax, Wealth Tax, Customs duty, and Cess with the appropriate
authorities. As of 31st March, 2010, the following amounts were still
to be deposited out of the total liabilities:
(Rs. in Lakhs)
Name of the Statute Nature of dues Amount to be
Deposited
Employee`s Provident Fund Provident Fund 265.30
& Miscellaneous Provisions
Act
Commercial Taxes Act Professional Tax 5.70
Employee State Insurance Act ESI 0.20
Income Tax Act TDS 453.00
Service Tax Act Service Tax 274.2
Sales Tax Value Added Tax 16.50
Income Tax Act Self Assessment Tax 607.90
Wealth Tax Act Wealth Tax 0.80
(b)According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident fund, Employees
State Insurance, Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty,
Sales Tax and Cess were in arrears as at 31st March 2010 for a period
of more than six months from the date they became payable except in the
below case which is still due for payment:
(Rs. in Lakhs)
Name of the Statute Nature of dues Amount Due For the Period
Income Tax Act Corporate Dividend Tax 233.85 F Year 2007-08
40.03 F Year 2008-09
(c) According to the information and explanations given to us, there
are no dues of Sales tax, Service tax, Income tax, Customs duty, Wealth
Tax, and Cess, which have not been deposited on account of any dispute
except in the below said cases:
(Rs. in Lakhs)
Name of the Nature of Disputed Assessment Forum where dispute is
Statute dues Amount Year pending
Income Tax
Act, Income 3849.18 2003-2004 Commissioner of Income
Tax,
1961 Tax to 2007-08 Appeals -VI
Sales Tax
Act, Sales 104.1 2005-06 to Commissioner of
Commercial
1956 Tax 2007-08 Taxes, Appeals
Service Tax
Act, Service 523.34 2004-05 to Customs, Exicise and
Service
1994 Tax 2007-08 Tax Appelate Tribunal
(x) The Company does not have any accumulated losses, as at March 31,
2010. The Company has incurred cash losses of Rs.220crores in the
financial year ended on that date and there are no cash losses in the
immediate preceding financial year.
(xi) There are defaults in repayment of dues to some financial
institution and banks although there are no dues to debenture holders
as at the balance sheet date.
(xii) According to information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the Company is not a chit fund or a Nidhi /mutual benefit
fund/ society.
(xiv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments.
(xv) In our opinion and according to information and explanations given
to us, and as per our examination of relevant records, the terms and
conditions on which guarantees are given are not prejudicial to the
interest of the Company.
(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, a categorical examination of the application of financing
received by the Company compared to the purposes as stipulated in the
terms of the sanction has not been possible.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us during
this audit, we have not come across situations of funds raised on
short-term basis being used for long-term investment.
(xviii) During the year the Company has not made any preferential
allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) During the period, the Company has not raised any funds by issue
of debentures.
(xx) The end use of money raised by preferential issue and Foreign
Currency Convertible bonds is disclosed in the Notes on Accounts to the
financial statement. We have verified the same, based on the
information and explanation given to us.
(xxi) During the course of our examination of the books of accounts
carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing
practices in India and according to the information and explanations
given to us, no fraud on or by the Company, has been noticed or
reported during the course of our audit.
for S.JANARDHAN & ASSOCIATES
Chartered Accountants
FRN : 005310S
Balakrishna S. Bhat
Bangalore Partner
September 30, 2010 Membership No.202976
|