We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Container Corporation of
India Limited as at 31st March,2011, and the Profit & Loss Account and
also the Cash Flow Statement of the company for the year ended on that
date annexed thereto, in which are incorporated the accounts of six
regions audited by respective branch auditors appointed by the
Comptroller and Auditor General of India, relied upon by us and the
accounts of Northern Region, North Central Region and Corporate Office,
New Delhi audited by us. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the company''s management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
1) As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003, as
amended by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004,
issued by the Central Government of India in terms of section 227 (4A)
of the Companies Act, 1956, and on the basis of such examination of the
books and records of the Company as we considered appropriate and the
information and explanations given during the course of audit and after
considering the reports of branch auditors, we enclose in the Annexure
a statement on the matters specified in Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
2) Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 1
above, we report that:
Sale/Lease Deeds in respect of Land & Buildings valuing Rs. 1.45 Crore
are yet to be executed in favour of the company (Note no. 2, Schedule
3).
3) We further report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit.
b) In our opinion, proper books of account, as required by law, have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books and proper returns adequate for the purpose of our audit
have been received from the branch auditors in respect of the regions
audited by them.
c) The reports of the branch auditors on the accounts of regions
audited by them have been received and considered by us in preparing
this report after making such adjustments, as we considered necessary.
d) The Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account.
e) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with Accounting
Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
f) In terms of Department of Company Affairs GSR 829 (E) dated 21st
October 2003, Government Companies are exempt from applicability of
provisions of Section 274 (1) (g) of the Companies Act, 1956.
g) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts, subject to our
comments in paragraphs 3 above (no financial impact) read together with
Significant Accounting Policies and Notes on Accounts, give the
information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so
required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India- i) in the case of
Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the company as at 31st March,
2011;
ii) in the case of Profit & Loss Account, of the profit for the year
ended on that date; and
iii) in the case of Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE ON THE
ACCOUNTS OF CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED FOR THE YEAR ENDED
31st MARCH, 2011.
(i) (a) The company has generally maintained proper records showing
full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of its
fixed assets.
(b) As per the information and explanations given to us, fixed assets
have been physically verified by the management during the year in
phased manner, which in our opinion, is reasonable having regards to
the size of the company and nature of Fixed Asset. The discrepancies
noticed on such verification were not material.
(c) The company has disposed/written off some of its fixed assets
during the year. However, in our opinion this has not affected the
going concern status of the company.
(ii) (a) The inventory of the company consisting of stores and spare
parts has been physically verified by the management on test check
basis. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is reasonable.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are generally reasonable and adequate in relation to the
size of the company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
(iii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us,
the company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(b) Not applicable in view of para (a) above.
(c) Not applicable in view of para (a) above.
(d) Not applicable in view of para (a) above.
(e) The company has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured from
companies, firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(f) Not applicable in view of para (e) above.
(g) Not applicable in view of para (e) above.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control systems commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard
to the purchase of stores and spare parts, fixed assets and for
rendering services.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that there are no contracts or arrangements that
need to be entered into the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(b) Not applicable in view of para (a) above.
(vi) The company has not accepted any deposits from the public in terms
of section 58A and 58AA and other relevant provisions of the Companies
Act, 1956.
(vii) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system, which
is generally commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) As informed to us, the Central Government has not prescribed
maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies
Act, 1956, in respect of the business of the company.
(ix) (a) The company is generally regular in depositing with
appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident
fund, investor education and protection fund, employee''s state
insurance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, custom duty,
excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it.
According to the information and explanations given to us, the
undisputed amounts payable in respect of outstanding statutory dues
that were in arrears, as at 31st March, 2011 for a period of more than
six months from the date they became payable are given below:
Name of the
Statute Nature of
the Dues Amnt. Period to which the
(Rs. in Crore) amount Relates
Customs Act, 1962 Custom Duty
(Auction) 1.37 1997-98 Rs. 1.08 cr.
(Northern
Region) 2003-04 Rs. 29.58lac.
Employees
provident PF on contractors 0.05 2009-10
fund Act payments (NWR)
Building & Other
Workers Cess under Building
& Other Workers 0.97 UPTO 2010-11
Welfare Cess
Act, 1996 Welfare Cess Act, 1996
Madhya Pradesh Property Tax 0.06 2005-06 to 2009-10
Municipal
Corporation Act 1961
(B) According to the information & explanations given to us, dues of
income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
duty and cess that have not been deposited on account of any dispute
are given below:
Forum where
dispute pending Nature of
the Dues Amt (Rs. in Cr.) Period to
which the
amount relates
CESTAT Service Tax 0.01 01st May 2003 to
Finance Act 1994 16th July 2003
CCE( Appeals) Service Tax 0.01 January 2004 to
Finance Act 1994 March 2004
Sub –registrar
Vadodora Additional Stamp
Duty 0.20 2003-04
Appellate authority
VAT Penalty u/s 86(19)
of DVAT Delhi 0.33 14th December 2005
Appellate authority
VAT Delhi Sales Tax (NR) 0.01 Year 1997-98
Delhi Sales tax act
Appellate authority
VAT Delhi Sales Tax (NR) 0.08 Year 2000-01
Delhi Sales tax act
Appellate authority
VAT Delhi Delhi VAT Act 0.11 Year 2008-09
Municipal Corp
Ludhiana Octeroi under
local taxes 0.16 2007-08
Appellate authority Service Tax 0.13 2007-08
Service tax Ludhiana Finance Act 1994
Dist. Court Kanpur Water Tax-Jal
Sansthan Kanpur 0.69 2000-01 to date
(x) The company has neither accumulated losses as at the end of the
financial year nor has incurred any cash losses during the financial
year covered by our audit and also in the immediately preceding
financial year.
(xi) The company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to financial
institution or banks. The company has not issued any debentures.
(xii) The company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual
benefit fund/society.
(xiv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company is not dealing in shares, securities and other
investments. The investments in the shares of joint ventures &
subsidiary company are held by the company in its own name and are not
traded.
(xv) The company has given counter indemnity to the guarantor (a joint
venture partner) in relation to the guarantor providing payment
guarantees to the banks for loans raised by the joint venture company,
to the extent of 26% (the shareholding of the company in joint venture)
of the loan and interest outstanding. As at 31st March,2011, the amount
of such counter indemnity works out to Rs. 126.32 Crore. In our opinion,
the terms and conditions thereof are not prima-facie prejudicial to the
interests of the company.
(xvi) The company has not taken any term loans during the year.
(xvii) As the company has not raised any funds on short-term basis,
this clause is not applicable.
(xviii) The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The company has not issued any debentures during the year.
(xx) As the company has not raised money by public issues during the
year, this clause is not applicable.
(xxi) As per the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on
or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.
For KUMAR CHOPRA & ASSOCIATES
Chartered Accountants
Firm Regn.No:000131N
(CA. R. K. Aggarwal)
Place: New Delhi Partner
Date: 21.07.2011 M. No. 081510 |