1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Ciba India Limited as
at March 31, 2009 and also the Profit and Loss account and the cash
flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms or
sub-section (4AJ of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose
in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4
and 5 of the said Order.
4. As more fully described in note 13 to the financial statements,
pending the final outcome of the Companys negotiations in respect of
premises leased to it, the Company has not assessed the fixed assets at
the said premises for impairment, if any. The carrying value of fixed
assets at the said leased premises is Rs. 120,633 thousands including
immovable assets of Rs. 70,117 thousands as identified by the company.
We are unable to comment the effect of adjustments, if any, had such
assessment for impairment been carried out.
5. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, and except for matter referred to in paragraph 4 above, we
report that:
i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
iii. The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash
flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956;
v. On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors, as on March 31, 2009, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
March 31, 2009 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us except for matter referred to in paragraph
4 above, the said accounts give the information required by the
Companies Act 1956, in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in
India;
(a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2009;
(b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditors Report — March 31, 2009
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date)
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) All fixed assets have not been physically verified by the
management during the year but there is a regular programme of
verification which, in our opinion, is reasonable having regard to the
size of the Company and the nature of its assets. As informed, no
material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.
(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
(iii) (a) The Company has granted loan to a Company covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956. The
maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 424,550 thousands and
the year-end balance of loan granted to such party was Rs. 254,550
thousands.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions for
such loans are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the
Company.
(c) In respect of loans granted, repayment of the principal amount is
as stipulated and payment of interest has been regular.
(d) There is no overdue amount of loans granted to companies, firms or
other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(e) As informed, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or
unsecured from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, and having regard to the explanation that other than the
items of special nature for which comparable quotations are not
available or where the Company has approved vendors for certain
products and accordingly, not obtained quotations, there is an adequate
internal control system commensurate with the size of the company and
the nature of its business for purchase inventory and fixed assets,
sale of goods and service. During the course of our audit, no major
weakness has been noticed in the internal control system in respect of
these areas.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the
management, we are of the opinion that the particulars of contracts or
arrangements referred to in section 301 of the Act that need to be
entered into the register maintained under section 301 have been so
entered.
(b) In respect of transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements exceeding value of Rupees five lakhs entered into during
the financial year, having regard to the explanation in paragraph (iv)
above because of the unique and specialized nature of the items
involved and absence of any comparable prices, we are unable to comment
whether the transactions were made at prevailing market prices at the
relevant time.
(vi) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) To the best of our knowledge and as explained, the Central
Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records under clause
(d) of sub-section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 for
the products of the Company.
(ix) (a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with
appropriate authorities undisputed statutory dues including provident
fund, investor education and protection fund, income-tax, sales-tax,
wealth-tax, service tax, custom duty, excise duty, cess and other
material statutory dues applicable to it. The provisions relating to
employees state insurance are not applicable to the Company.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax,
service tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and other undisputed
statutory dues were outstanding, at the year-end, for a period of more
than six months from the date they became payable.
(c) According to the records of the Company, the dues outstanding of
income tax, sales tax, customs duty, and excise duty on account of any
dispute, are as follows:
Name of the Statute Nature of Dues
Income Tax Act* Demand arising out of
disallowance for back
wages to employees
Income Tax Act Penalty u/s 271 (1 )(c)
Income Tax Act Demand arising out of
various disallowances
Income Tax Act Demand arising out of
various disallowances
Delhi Sales Tax Act Non-submission of forms
Central Sales Tax Act
Delhi Sales Tax Act Non-submission of forms
Central Sales Tax Act
Delhi Sales Tax Act Short credit of taxes paid in
assessment
Central Excise Act* Duty alleged to have been
collected by the Company
but not paid
Amount Period to Forum where
(Rs.) which the dispute is pending
amount relates
12,814,004 2000-2001 Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal
14,013,967 2000-2001 Commissioner of
Income Tax (appeals)
4,800,501 2002-2003 Commissioner of
Income Tax (appeals)
12,931,870 2003-2004 Commissioner of
Income Tax (appeals)
160,698 1999-2000 Remanded back to
Assessing Authority
297,118 2004-2005 Remanded back to
Assessing Authority
17,880 2000-2001 Assessing Officer
3,013,000 1992-1993 Superintendent of
Central Excise
* disclosed as contingent liability in the financial statements
(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year and it has not incurred any cash losses in the current and
immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to bank. The Company had
no transactions with financial institutions and had no debentures
outstanding during the year.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of
shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual
benefit fund/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of
the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not
applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In respect of dealing/trading in shares, securities, debentures
and other investments, in our opinion and according to the information
and explanations given to us, proper records have been maintained of
the transactions and contracts and timely entries have been made
therein. These investments have been held by the Company, in its own
name.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
(xvi) The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the
year.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment.
(xviii)The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties or companies covered in the register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money through a public issue during
the year.
(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the year.
For S. R. Batliboi & Co.
Chartered Accountants
Per Vijay Maniar
Mumbai, Partner
June 11, 2009 Membership No.: 36738
|