1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of
CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED (formerly known as
Cholamandalam DBS Finance Limited) (the Company) as at 31 March,
2011, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement of the
company for the year ended on that date, both annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and the disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and the significant estimates
made by the Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (CARO)
issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 227(4A) of the
Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
maters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report as follows:
(a) we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(b) in our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as it appears from our examination of
those books;
(c) the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report are in compliance
with the Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211(3C) of the
Companies Act, 1956;
(e) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
company as at 31 March, 2011;
(ii) in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the
company for the year ended on that date and
(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the
company for the year ended on that date.
5. On the basis of the written representations received from the
Directors as on 31 March, 2011 taken on record by the Board of
Directors, none of the Directors is disqualified as on 31 March, 2011
from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 274(1)(g) of the
Companies Act, 1956.
Annexure to the Auditors Report
(Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date)
(i) Having regard to the nature of the companys business/
activities/result, clauses 4(ii), 4(viii), 4(x), 4(xiii), 4(xiv) and
4(xx) of CARO are not applicable.
(ii) In respect of its fixed assets:
(a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars,
including quantitative details and situation of the fixed assets.
(b) The fixed assets were physically verified during the year by the
Management in accordance with a regular programme of verification
which, in our opinion, provides for physical verification of all the
fixed assets at reasonable intervals. According to the information and
explanation given to us, no material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification.
(c) The Fred assets disposed of during the year, in our opinion, do not
constitute a substantial part of the fixed assets of the company and
such disposal has, in our opinion, not affected the going concern
status of the company.
(iii) In respect of loans, secured or unsecured, granted by the Company
to companies, firms or other partes covered in the Register under
Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, according to the information
and explanations given to us:
(a) The Company has granted loans to two subsidiaries aggregating to
Rs.4188.00 lakhs. At the year-end, the balance due from one company
amounted to Rs.304 lakhs while the dues from another company was fully
received before the year end. The maximum amount involved during the
year was Rs.2282.60 lakhs (number of partes - two).
(b) The rate of interest and other terms and conditions of such loans
are, in our opinion, prima facie not prejudicial to the interests of
the company.
(c) While one subsidiary has settled its dues during the year, the dues
from the other company has become doubtful and has been fully provided
for.
(d) There were no overdue amounts remaining outstanding as at the year
end except the loan referred in (c) above.
In respect of loans, secured or unsecured, taken by the company from
companies, firms or other partes covered
in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act,
1956, according to the information and explanations given to us:
(a) The Company has taken loans aggregating Rs.3270 lakhs from one
party during the year. At the year-end, the outstanding balance of such
loans taken aggregated Rs. NIL and the maximum amount involved during
the year was Rs.1940 lakhs (number of partes - One).
(b) The rate of interest and other terms and conditions of such loans
are, in our opinion, prima facie not prejudicial to the interests of
the Company.
(c) The payments of principal amounts and interest in respect of such
loans are regular/as per stipulations.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the company and the nature of its business with regard
to purchases of fixed assets and the sale of repossessed automobile
assets and services. During the course of our audit, we have not
observed any major weakness in such internal control system. The
Company does not purchase inventory nor does it sell any goods (other
than repossessed automobile assets) in the ordinary course of its
business.
(v) In respect of contracts or arrangements entered in the Register
maintained in pursuance of Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, to
the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the information
and explanations given to us:
(a) The particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to Section
301 that needed to be entered in the Register maintained under the said
Section have been so entered.
(b) Where each of such transaction is in excess of Rs.5 lakhs in
respect of any party, the transactions have been made at prices which
are prima facie reasonable having regard to the prevailing market
prices at the relevant time.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has complied with the provisions of Sections
58A and 58AA or any other relevant provisions of the Companies Act,
1956 and the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, as
applicable to the
company, with regard to the deposits accepted from the public prior to
November 1, 2006. However, in respect of overdue amounts totalling to
Rs.1.86 lakhs, payments have not made since the repayment of the same
to the depositors has been stayed by the Madras High Court. Further,
in respect of overdue amounts totalling to Rs.0.11 lakhs, payments have
not been made as per instructions received from the Central Bureau of
Investigation. Other than the above, according to the information and
explanations given to us, no order has been passed by the company Law
Board or the National company Law Tribunal or the Reserve Bank of India
or any Court or any other Tribunal.
(vii) In our opinion, the internal audit functions carried out during
the year by the companys internal audit department as well as an
external firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by the Management,
have been commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of
its business.
(viii) According to the information and explanations given to us in
respect of statutory dues:
(a) The Company has generally been regular in depositing undisputed
dues, including Provident Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund,
Income-tax, Sales Tax, Value Added Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Cess
and other material statutory dues applicable to it with the appropriate
authorities.
(b) There were no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Income-tax,
Wealth Tax, Custom Duty, Cess and other material statutory dues in
arrears as at 31 March, 2011 for a period of more than six months from
the date they became payable except for fixed deposit amounts totalling
to Rs.1.97 lakhs which have not been credited to Investor Education and
Protection Fund since the repayment to the depositors has been stayed
by the Madras High Court for an amount of Rs. 1.86 lakhs, payments have
not been made pursuant to instructions received from Central Bureau of
Investigation for an amount of Rs.0.11 lakhs.
(c) Details of dues of Income-tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax
and Cess which have not been deposited as on 31 March, 2011 on account
of disputes are given below:
Statute Nature of Forum where Dispute Period to which
Dues is pending the amount relates
(Financial Year)
Income Tax
Act, 1961 Tax and Commissioner of
Income Tax 2000-01,2005-06
Interest (Appeals) and 2006-07
Tamil Nadu
General Sales
Tax Act, 1959 Sales Tax Sales Tax
Appellate
Tribunal 1994-95 228.59
Central
Sales Tax
Act, 1956 Sales Tax Sales Tax
Appellate
Tribunal 1994-95 59.77
Bihar Finance
Act, 1981 Sales Tax Sales Tax
Appellate
Tribunal 1992-93 and 1993-94
Gujarat Sales
Tax Act, 1969 Sales Tax Sales Tax
Tribunal 1996-97 and 1997-98
Karnataka Sales
Tax Act, 1957 Sales Tax Sales Tax
Appellate
Tribunal 1992-93 to 1994-95,
1996-97 and 1999-00
Delhi Sales
Tax Act, 1975 Sales Tax Sales Tax
Appellate
Tribunal 1990-91
Sales Tax Deputy
Commissioner of 1991-92 to 1998-99
U.P Trade Tax
Act, 1948 Trade Tax
Service Tax
(Chapter V
of the Service Madras High Court 2001-02 and 2002-03
Finance Act, Tax
1994)
Statute Amount involved (Rs. in lakhs)
Income Tax Act, 1961 432.54
Tamil Nadu General Sales 228.59
Tax Act, 1959
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 59.77
Bihar Finance Act, 1981 2.19
Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 2.03
Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 19.79
Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 7.58
U.P Trade Tax Act, 1948 9.11
Service Tax (Chapter V of the 69.33
Finance Act, 1994)
(ix) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not defaulted in the repayment of dues to
banks and debenture holders.
(x) In our opinion, the company has maintained adequate records where
it has granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of
pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the terms and conditions of the guarantees given by the
company for loans taken by others from banks and financial institutions
are not prima facie prejudicial to the interests of the company.
(xii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the term loans have been applied for the purposes for
which they were obtained, other than temporary deployment pending
application.
(xiii) On the basis of review of Asset / Liability Gap Analysis report,
giving utilisation of funds on overall basis and the related
information made available to us and as per the explanation given to
us, we report that funds raised on short term basis have, prima facie,
not been used during the year for long term investment.
(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not made preferential allotment of shares to partes and
companies covered in the Register maintained under Section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the period covered by our audit report, the company had issued 7200
debentures of Rs.10 lakh each. The Company has created security in
respect of the debentures issued.
(xvi) To the best of our knowledge and according to the information and
explanations given to us, no fraud by the company and no material fraud
on the company has been noticed or reported during the year.
For Deloite Haskins & Sells
Chartered Accountants
(Registration No.008072S)
M.K.Ananthanarayanan
Partner
(Membership No.19521)
Chennai
30 April, 2011
|