We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Chettinad Cement
Corporation Ltd (the Company) as at 31 March 2011 and the Profit and
Loss account and cash flow statement for the year ended on that date,
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
1) As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (the
Order) as amended by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) (Amendment) Order
2004 issued by the Central Government of India in terms of Section 227
(4A) of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the annexure a statement
on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
2) Further to our comments in the annexure referred to above, we report
that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit.
b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have
been kept by the company, so far as appears from examination of those
books.
c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account.
d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956,
to the extent applicable.
e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we report that none of
the directors as on 31 March 2011 is disqualified from being appointed
as a director in the company in terms Section 274 (1) (g) of the
Companies Act, 1956 on the said date.
f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with
schedules and
Note N0.26 regarding change in accounting policy on charging
depreciation/depletion on land during the year, which has resulted in
understatement of profit to the extent of Rs.612.13 lakhs includes an
amount of Rs.460.32 lakhs pertains to earlier years and
subject to Note no.9 regarding the liability, if any under the
provisions of jute packaging materials (Compulsory use in the Packing
Commodities) Act , to 87 and other notes thereon give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view, in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India.
(i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
company as at March 31,2011.
(ii) In the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Profit for the
year ended on that date, and
(iii) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flow for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS'' REPORT REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 1 0F OUR REPORT
OF EVEN DATE
i. a) The Company is maintaining proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of Fixed
Assets.
b) These Fixed Assets have been physically verified by the management
at reasonable intervals and no material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification.
c) No substantial parts of fixed assets of the company have been
disposed of during the year.
ii. a) Inventories have been physically
verified at reasonable intervals by the management.
b) The procedures of physical verification of Inventory followed by the
management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
company and the nature of its business.
c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory and
discrepancies on physical verification as compared to book records were
not material and have been dealt properly in the books of account.
iii. a) The Company has taken an unsecured inter corporate deposit of
Rs.i7crores from Chettinad Morimura Semi Conductor Materials Pvt Ltd.
in which the Directors of this Company are Directors. The maximum
amount due during the year was Rs.22 crores and the year end balance of
Deposit taken was Rs.22 crores.
In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions of
the Deposit are not, prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the
company.
The Company is regular in payment of interest and the repayment of the
principal during the year ended 31 March 2011.
The Company has not given any loans secured or unsecured to parties
referred to Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
iv. In our opinion, there is an adequate internal control system
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business for the purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the
sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit no major
weakness has been observed in the internal control system.
v. According to the explanation and information furnished by the
company there are no contracts or arrangements referred to in Section
301 of the Companies Act 1956, entered into by the company except the
inter corporate deposit referred in item (iii) above which has been
entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956.
vi. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with the provisions of section
58A and 58AA and the rules framed there under with regard to the
deposits accepted from the public.
vii. In our opinion, the company has an Internal Audit System
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
viii. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
company relating to manufacture of cement pursuant to the order made by
the Central Government for the maintenance of cost records under
Section 209 (i) (d) of the Companies Act 1956 and we are of the opinion
that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been
maintained. We have not however made a detailed examination of the
records with a view to determining whether they are accurate or
complete.
ix. The company has been generally regular in depositing undisputed
statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and
Protection Fund, Employees State Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax,
Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Customs Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and other
statutory dues with the appropriate authorities in India.
There are no arrears of outstanding statutory dues as on 31.3.2011 for
a period of more than six months from the date they became payable. •
At the end of the financial year there were no dues of Sales Tax,
Income Tax, Customs Duty, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Excise Duty and
Cess, which have not been deposited on account of any dispute except as
follows:
NAME OF THE STATUTE NATURE OF DUES AMOUNT FORUM WHERE
(Rs. IN DISPUTE
LAKHS) IS PENDING
TNGST Act 1959 SalesTax and 1.27 Sales Tax Appellate
Penalty Tribunal,Chennai.
x.The company did not have any accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year, nor had it incurred any cash loss during the financial
year or in the immediately preceding financial year.
xi. According to the records produced, the company has not defaulted in
repayment of its dues to any financial institution or bank or debenture
holders during the year.
xii. The company has not granted any loansand advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debenturesand other securities.
xiii. The provisions of any special statute applicable to chit fund/
nidhi/ mutual benefit fund/societies are not applicable to the Company.
xiv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company is not a dealer ortrader in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments.
xv. According to the information given to us, the company has not given
any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks orfinancial
institutions.
xvi. On the basis of review of utilization of funds on an overall
basis, in ouropinion, the term loan taken by the company were applied
for the purposes for which the loans were obtained.
xvii. On the basis of review of utilization of funds on an overall
basis, in our opinion, the funds raised on short term basis have not
been used for the long term investment during the year.
xviii. The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
during the year to parties and companies covered in the register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
xix.The Company has not issued any debentures.
xx.The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
xxi. During the course of our examination of the books of account
carried out in accordance With the generaIIy accepted auditing
practices in India, we have not come across any instance of fraud on or
by the company nor have we been informed by the management of any such
instance being noticed or reported during the year.
for P.B.Vijayaraghavan & Co.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Regn.No.oo472iS
P.B. Srinivasan
Partner
(M. No. 203774)
for V.Soundararajan & Co
Chartered Accountants
Firm Regn.No.oo3943S
V. S. Ravikumar
Partner
(M. No. 018030)
for Krishaan & Co.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Regn.No.001453S
V. Krishnan
Partner
(M. No. 010970)
Place:Chennai
Date:27.05.2011
|