Real-time Stock quotes, portfolio, LIVE TV and more.
0 | Auditor's Report (Calcom Vision) | Year End : Mar '12 |
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of CALCOM VISION LIMITED as
at 31st March, 2012 the Statement of Profit and Loss Account and also
the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the manage- ment, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) order, 2003(as
amended), issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub
-section (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we annex
hereto a statement on the matters specified in paragraph 4 and 5 of the
said order.
2. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 1
above, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have
been kept by the company so far, as appears from our examination of
such books;
(c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss
Account and Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with
the Accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211
of the Companies Act, 1956;
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
of the company as on 31st March 2012 and taken on record by the Board
of Directors, we report that none of the Directors is disqualified as
on 31st March, 2012 from being appointed as a director of the company
in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the
Companies Act, 1956;
(f) Attention is invited to Note No. 16, regarding management opinion
that Sundry Debtors outstanding for a period of more than six months,
considered good amounting to Rs. 30.71 Lacs are fully recov- erable and
hence no provision is made there against.
(g) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the
notes thereon in Schedule ''O'' gives the information required by the
Companies Act, 1956 in the manner so required and subject to Note No.
34 regarding non provision of interest due to banks. Had '' this
provision been made, the ''Net Loss'' for the year 2011-12 and
''Interest Accrued and due'' would have been higher by such amount,
gives a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(i) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2012,
(ii) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss Account, of the
LOSS of the Company for the year ended on that date and
(iii) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) As explained to us, all the fixed assets have been physically
verified by the management during the year and we are informed that no
material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(c) The company has not sold/ disposed off any substantial part of its
fixed Assets during the year which has an impact on the going concern
of the Entity.
(ii) (a) The Inventory has been physically verified during the year by
the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable
(b) The procedure of physical verification of inventory followed by the
management is reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining the records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared
to book records, which were not material, have been properly dealt with
in the books of account.
(iii) (a) The company has not granted any secured or unsecured loans to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the registers maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 so clause iii(a), (b),(c)
& (d) of the Companies (Auditor Report) Order 2003 (as amended) are not
applicable. The company has not granted any secured or unsecured loans
to companies, firms or other parties covered in the registers
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(e) The company has not taken any fresh unsecured loans from persons
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 so clause iii (e), (f) & (g) of the Companies (Auditor
Report) order 2003 (as amended) are not applicable.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchase of inventory, fixed assets and with
regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our
audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major
weaknesses in internal controls.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that, the particulars of contract or arrangement
referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered
in the register maintained under that section.
(B) iN OUR OPINION AND ACCORDING TO INFORMATION AND EXPLANATIONS GIVEN
to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements
entered in the register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lakhs in respect of
any party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
(vi) The company has not accepted any deposits from the public; hence,
provisions of Section 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956 and
Companies (Acceptance of Deposit) Rules, 1975 with regard to the
deposits accepted from the public are not applicable.
(vii) As per the information and explanation received by us from the
management we report that, the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) The Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost
records under clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 209 of the
Companies Act, 1956 for any of the products of the Company.
(ix) (a) According to the records of the Company, it is generally
regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed statutory
dues including provident fund, investor education protection fund,
employee''s state insur- ance, income tax, sales tax, wealth tax, custom
duty, excise duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to
it.
(b) According to the records of the Company and the information and
explanations given to us, the following are particular of dues on
account of excise duty / sales tax that have not been deposited on
account of any dispute:
Name of the Nature of the Amount Period to which Forum where
Statute Dues the
(Rs. In amount relates pending
Lakhs)
Delhi Sales
Tax Act DST 3.61 1996-97 Dy.Comm.
(Appeals)
- Delhi
Central
Sales Act. CST 2.34 1996-97 Dy.Comm.
(Appeals)
- Delhi
Delhi Sales
Tax Act DST 53.48 1997-98 Add.Comm.
(Appeals)
Central
Sales Act. CST 2.03 1997-98 Add.Comm.
(Appeals)
Delhi Sales
Tax Act DST 17.42 1998-99 Add.Comm.
(Appeals)
Central
Sales Act. CST 1.82 1998-99 Add.Comm.
(Appeals)
Delhi Sales
Tax Act DST 3.34 1999-00 Dy.Comm.
(Appeals)
- Delhi
Central
Sales Act. CST 0.16 1999-00 Dy.Comm.
(Appeals)
- Delhi
Central Sales
Tax Act CST 0.20 2007-08 Dy. Comm.
(Assessment)
Gautam Budh
Nagar
U.P Trade
Tax Act UPTT 0.09 2007-08 Dy. Comm.
(Assessment)
Gautam Budh
Nagar
(x) The accumulated losses at the end of the financial year are more
than its net worth. The company has not incurred any cash losses during
the current financial year covered by our audit as well as in the
immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has defaulted in repayment of dues to banks.
The details of period and amount of default as ascertained by the
management is as follows:
Name of Bank Principal
Amount Interest accrued
and due Period to which
relates
(Rs. in lakhs) (Rs. in lakhs)
(reworked)
State Bank of Patiala -
Cash Credit 421.10 349.04 Oct. 03 to
Mar. 12
State Bank of Patiala
- Working Capital
Term Loan 168.00 140.00 Dec. 03 to
Mar. 12
Bank of India -
Cash Credit 332.17 283.03 Sep. 03 to
Mar. 12
Bank of India
- Term Loan 371.15 318.80 Jun. 03 to
Mar. 12
Canara Bank 348.07 300.47 Sep. 03 to
Mar. 12
ICICI Bank Ltd. 311.66 272.15 Mar. 02 to
Mar.12
An amount of Rs.1952.14 Lacs (Principle) as above is overdue for
repayment in respect of Secured Loans/Cash credit facilities taken from
the banks and other financial institutions as above. As explained to
us, reasonable steps have been taken for payment of principal.
(xii) According to information and explanations given to us, the
company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) The company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual benefit
fund/society. Therefore, the Provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the
Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not
applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accord- ingly,
the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report)
Order, 2003 (as amended), are not applicable to the company.
( xv) As informed to us, the Company has not given any guarantee for
loans taken by others from bank or financial institutions.
(xvi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not availed any fresh term loan from banks
or financial institutions during the financial year covered by our
audit so this clause is not applicable on the company.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report
that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investments. No long-term funds have been used to finance short-term
assets.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 during the financial year
covered by our audit.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
financial year covered by our audit.
(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
For SHANTI PRASHAD & COMPANY
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
PLACE: DELHI (SATISH AGRAWAL)
DATED: 30-05-2012 PARTNER
Membership No. 505969/FRN No.019923N |
|
![]() | |
| Source : Dion Global Solutions Limited | |
![]() | |