I. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of BOC India Limited (''the
Company'') as at 31 December 2011 and also the Profit and Loss Account
and the Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that
date annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
II. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
III.As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003, as
amended (''Order''), issued by the Central Government of India in terms
of subsection (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we
enclose in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in
paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
IV. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
a) we have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash
Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956;
e) on the basis of written representations received from directors as
on 31 December 2011 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we
report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 December
2011 from being appointed as a Director in terms of Section 274 (1) g)
of the Companies Act, 1956;
f) in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
- in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of the affairs of the
Company as at 31 December 2011;
- in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit of the
Company for the year ended on that date; and
- in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows of the
Company for the year ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditors'' Report.*
I. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its
fixed assets by which all fixed assets are verified in a phased manner
over a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of
physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the
Company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were
noticed on such verification.
c) Fixed assets disposed off during the year were not substantial, and
therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.
II. a) The inventory, except goods-in-transit has been physically
verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the
frequency of such verification is reasonable.
b) The procedures for the physical verification of inventories followed
by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size
of the Company and the nature of its business.
c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
III. The Company has neither granted nor taken any loans, secured or
unsecured, to or from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
IV. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, and having regard to the explanation that purchases of
certain items of inventories and fixed assets are for the Company''s
specialised requirements and suitable alternative sources are not
available to obtain comparable quotations, there is an adequate
internal control system commensurate with the size of the Company and
the nature of its business with regard to purchase of inventories and
fixed assets and with regard to the sale of goods and services. We have
not observed any major weakness in the internal control system during
the course of the audit.
V. a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the particulars of the contract or arrangement referred to
in section 301 of the Companies Act,1956 have been entered in the
register required to be maintained under that section.
b) Under the aforesaid contract or arrangement, certain services that
are rendered by the Company as per the specialised requirements of a
buyer and the value of such services exceeds Rs. 5 lakhs during the
year, suitable alternative sources are not available to obtain
comparable quotations. However, on the basis of information and
explanations provided, the same appear reasonable.
VI. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public during the
year.
VII. In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
VIII. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the rules prescribed by the Central Government for
maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1) d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 in respect of the products and are of the opinion that prima
facie, the prescribed accounts and records have been made and
maintained. However, we have not made a detailed examination of the
records.
IX. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, amounts
deducted/accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed
statutory dues including Provident Fund, Investor Education and
Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales-tax,
Wealth tax, Service tax, Customs duty, Excise duty and other material
statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited during the year
by the Company with appropriate authorities.
According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Investor
Education and Protection Fund, Employees'' State Insurance, Income-tax,
Sales tax, Wealth tax, Service tax, Customs duty, Excise duty, Cess and
other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31 December 2011
for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are
no dues of Customs duty and Wealth tax which have not been deposited
with the appropriate authorities on account of any dispute.
According to the information and explanations given to us, dues of
Income-tax, Sales tax, Service tax and Excise duty which have not been
deposited by the Company on account of any dispute are listed below:
Amount in Period to which
Name of the
Statute Nature
of Dues rupees
million* amount relates Forum where
the dispute is
pending
Central
State Sales
Tax Act and
VAT Acts Sales Tax 2.53 1982 - 1992 High Court
1981 - 1988
243.17 1992 - 2008 Revisional Board
1993 - 1994
1995 - 1997
5.49 2003 - 2006 Tribunal
18.71 2008 - 2009 Senior Joint
Commissioner
(Appeals) of
Commercial Taxes
2003 - 2005
41.27 2006 - 2009 Joint
Commissioner
(Appeals) of
Commercial Taxes
2005 - 2008
35.76 1997 - 1998 Deputy
Commissioner
(Appeals) of
Commercial Taxes
2.05 2007 - 2008 Assistant
Commissioner
of Commercial
Taxes
1998 - 1999
2001 - 2003
2005 - 2007
30.67 2008 - 2010 Commissioner
of Commercial
Taxes
Central
Excise Act,
1944 Excise Duty 21.72 1999 - 2009 Supreme Court
2.26 1998 - 2001 High Court
126.94** 1991 - 2011 Customs, Excise
and Service
Tax Appellate
Tribunal
7.89 1991 - 2010 Commissioner
(Appeals)
24.69 2007 - 2010 Commissioner
of Central
Excise
4.14 2010 - 2011 Additional
Commissioner
2.52 2006 - 2010 Deputy
Commissioner
4.46 2005 - 2011 Assistant
Commissioner
Finance
Act, 1994 Service Tax 32.40 2005 - 2008 Customs,Excise
and Service
Tax Appellate
Tribunal
5.94 2005 - 2010 Commissioner
(Appeals)
121.48 2004 - 2010 Commissioner
of Service Tax
3.24 2004 - 2007 Additional
Commissioner
0.13 2009 - 2011 Deputy
Commissioner
6.04 2007 - 2011 Assistant
Commissioner
* Excluding the demands the proceedings of which have been set aside or
remanded for reassessment by the appropriate authorities.
** Including disputed dues aggregating to Rs. 31.06 million in respect
of Excise dispute, which have been stayed by respective authorities.
X. The Company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year and has not incurred cash losses in the financial year
and in the immediately preceding financial year.
XI. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to its
bankers. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
year.
XII. The Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis
of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities.
XIII. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit
fund/society.
XIV. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments.
XV. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the terms and conditions on which the Company has given
guarantees for loans taken by others from banks or financial
institutions are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
XVI. Based on the information and explanations given to us by the
management, term loans were applied for the purpose for which the loans
were obtained, though idle/surplus fund which were not required for
immediate utilisation have been gainfully invested in fixed deposits
with banks. The maximum amount of idle/surplus fund in fixed deposits
during the year was Rs. 1,100.00 million. There is no outstanding
idle/surplus fund as at the end of the year.
XVII. According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we are of
the opinion that the funds raised on short-term basis have not been
used for long-term investment.
XVIII. The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to companies/firms/parties covered in the register maintained under
Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
XIX. The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
year.
XX. The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
XXI. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
For BSR & Co. Kolkata
Chartered Accountants 9 February 2012
Firm Registration No.: 101248W
Vikram Advani, Partner
Membership No.: 091765 |