1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Bata India Limited
(the Company) as at December 31, 2010 and also the Profit and Loss
account and the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose
in the Annexure a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4
and 5 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we
report that:
i. We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii. In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books ;
iii. The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
iv. In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash
flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the accounting
standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
v. On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors, as on December 31, 2010, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
December 31, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
vi. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India;
a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at December 31, 2010;
b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
c) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date
Re: Bata India Limited
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during
the year and no material discrepancies were identified on such
verification.
(c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.
(ii) (a) The management has conducted physical verification of
inventory at reasonable intervals during the year.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory and no
material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification.
(iii) (a) As informed, the Company has not granted any loans, secured
or unsecured to companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and as
such, clauses 4(iii) (a) to 4(iii) (d) of the Companies (Auditors
Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not applicable.
(b) As informed, the Company has not taken any loans, secured or
unsecured from companies, firms or other parties covered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and as
such, clauses 4(iii) (e) to 4(iii) (g) of the Companies (Auditors
Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not applicable.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
purchase of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, no major weakness has been
noticed in the internal control system in respect of these areas.
During the course of our audit, we have not observed any continuing
failure to correct major weakness in internal control system of the
company.
(v) (a) According to the information and explanations provided by the
management, we are of the opinion that there are no transactions that
need to be entered into the Register maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, as there are no transactions that need to be entered into
Register maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act,1956,
paragraph 4(v)(b) of the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) is not applicable.
(vi) In respect of deposits accepted, in our opinion and according to
the information and explanations given to us, directives issued by the
Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 58A, 58AA or any
other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules
framed there under, to the extent applicable, have been complied with.
We are informed by the management that no order has been passed by the
Company Law Board, National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of
India or any Court or any other Tribunal.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
Company pursuant to the rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956, and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained.
(ix) (a) Undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, or employees state insurance,
income-tax, sales-tax, wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise
duty, cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it have
generally been regularly deposited with the appropriate authorities.
Further, since the Central Government has till date not prescribed the
amount of cess payable under section 441 A of the Companies Act, 1956,
we are not in a position to comment upon the regularity or otherwise of
the company in depositing the same.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed dues payable in respect of provident fund, investor
education and protection fund, employees state insurance, income-tax,
wealth-tax, service tax, sales-tax, customs duty, excise duty, cess and
other material statutory dues were outstanding, at the year end, for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(c) According to the information and explanation given to us and
records of the Company, there are no dues of income-tax, sales-tax,
wealth-tax, service tax, customs duty, excise duty and cess which have
not been deposited on account of any dispute, other than following:
Name of the Nature of dues Amount (Rs Period to
in thousand) which the
amount relates pending
Various State MRP-Tax on tax
case 16,480 1987-88 to
Sales Tax Acts 2001-02
Various State Purchase Tax
Dispute at 5,100 1984-85
Sales Tax Acts Faridabad
Various State Revenue recovery
against 6,700 1994-95
Sales Tax Acts non payment of dem 1998-99
and in assessment 1999-00
2000-01
Various State Tax in dispute u/s
92 of 2,780 1991-92
Sales Tax Acts Central Sales tax
Act regarding
non-submission of
forms
Various State Penalty for non
payment 1,200 2002
Sales Tax Acts
of tax and non collection
on C forms
Various State Appeal Against 1,400 1985-87
Sales Tax Acts
Assessment Order
Central Excise Excise Duty demand
on 1,500 1987-88
Act,1944 closing balance
exempted footwear.
Central Excise Duty demanded for
sale of 7,030 1997-1999
Act,1944 footwear at domestic
Tariff area of which
final hearing before
commissioner concluded
and order is pending.
Name of the Forum where
statute dispute is
pending
Various State
Sales Tax Acts High Court,Chennai
Various State
Sales Tax Acts Supreme Court
Various State
Sales Tax Acts STAT, Kerala
Various State
Sales Tax Acts High Court, UP
Various State
Sales Tax Acts STAT, Kolkata
Various State
Sales Tax Acts High Court
Central Excise CCE(Appeals
Act,1944 Kolkata)
Central Excise Commissioner
Act,1944 Central Excise
Chennai
Name of the Nature of dues Amount (Rs Period to
statute in thousand) which the
amount relates pending
Central Excise Duty demanded on 870 2005
Act, 1944 various chemicals used
for processing Of leather
and subsequent clearance
of said processed leather
for manufacture of footwear
(Exempted)
Central Excise Disallowance for trade 2,750 1995-97
Act,1944 discount for sale of
footwear to retail outlet
Central Excise Excise duty demanded on 5,040 2004-05
Act,1944 parts of footwear used
captively in manufacture
of exempted footwear
Central Excise Central Excise Duty Demanded 5,100 2004
Act,1944 for clearance of Defective
Footwear without payment of
Central Excise Duty, after
necessary re-processing of
said footwear. The process
treated as MANUFACTURE
Central Excise Excise duty demanded 15,560 2004-05
Act,1944 for movement of raw
material to job worker
without payment of duty
Central Excise Disallowing of abatement 2,770 2006
Act,1944 @ 40% on MRP for 2007
Institutional Sales. Sale of 2008
Industrial Boots & Mines
Safety Boots.
Central Excise Demand for alleged non
reversal 5,440 2007
Act,1944 of CENVAT credit on cenveted
inputs and non payment of CE
duty on finished goods
on written off stock as
per Balance sheet
Central Excise Non compliance of the
condition 21,480 2008
Act, 1944 of the notification for
marking
MRP on factory seconds
cleared on payment of
appropriate C.E. duty.
Name of the Forum where
statute dispute is
pending
Central Excise Commissioner,
Act,1944 CCE Kolkata
Central Excise CESTAT-Chennai
Act, 1944
Central Excise Additional
Act, 1944 Commissioner of
Central Excise -
Kolkata
Central Excise CESTAT-Kolkata
Act, 1944
Central Excise Commissioner
Act, 1944 (Appeal Kolkata.
Central Excise CESTAT, Kolkata
Act, 1944
Central Excise Commissioner
Act, 1944 Kolkata.
Central Excise CESTAT, Kolkata
Act, 1944
Name of th Nature of dues Amount (Rs Period to
statute in thousand) which the
amount relates pending
Central Excise Exclusion of
sales tax @ 8% 1,500 2009
Act,1944
Customs Duty demand on
account of 10,340 2001
Act,1942 short levy of customs
duty (anti dumping
duty) for which
hearing before
commissioner
concluded
and the order
received.
Customs Wrong availment of 83,760 1998-2003
Act,1942 concessional rate of
customs duty etc.
against which the
hearing has not
finalized as yet
Customs Adv. License No.
P/W/3497630 100 2002
Act,1961 dt.7.2.94
Employees State Exemption from ESI
through 14,195 2007-2008
Insurance Act, Bata Workers Sickness
1948 Benifit Society
Income Tax Short Term Capital Gains 230,552* 2007-08
Act,1961
Name of the Forum where
statute dispute is
pending
Central Excise Additional
Act,1944 Commissioner of
Central Excisefootwear
CCR Kolkata
Customs Deputy
Commissioner of
Customs
Act,1942
Customs CESTAT-Kolkata
Act,1942
Customs DGFT, Kolkata
Act,1942
Employees Regional Director
State Insurance ESI, Kolkata
Act 1948
Income Tax CIT (A), Kolkata
Act,1961
* As informed, any liability arising on transfer of development rights
under the above reported case would be borne by the Joint Venture
Company in terms of joint development agreement entered in December,
2006.
(x) The Company has no accumulated losses at the end of the financial
year and it has not incurred cash losses in the current and immediately
preceding financial year.
(xi) Based on our audit procedures and as per the information and
explanations given by the management, we are of the opinion that the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to banks. The Company
had no outstanding dues in respect of debenture holders and financial
institutions.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us and
based on the documents and records produced to us, the Company has not
granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of pledge of
shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi /
mutual benefit fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause
4(xiii) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 (as amended)
are not applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
(xvi) The Company did not have any term loans outstanding during the
year.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties or companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company did not have any outstanding debentures during the
year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by way of public issue during
the year.
(xxi) Based upon the audit procedures performed for the purpose of
reporting the true and fair view of the financial statements and as per
the information and explanations given by the management, we report
that no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during
the course of our audit.
For S.R. BATLIBOI & CO.
Firm Registration No. 301003E
Chartered Accountants
per Rajiv Goyal
Partner
Membership No.: 94549
Place : Gurgaon
Date : February 23, 2011
|