We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Alembic Limited (the
Company) as at 31st March, 2011, the Profit and Loss Account and also
the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
The ‘Pharmaceutical Undertaking’ of the Company got demerged and
transferred to the Company pursuance to the Scheme of Arrangement as
approved by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court with effect from appointed
date i.e.01-04-2010. These Financial Statements pertaining to the
Company have been extracted from the books of account and records
maintained by the Company jointly with its Pharmaceutical Undertaking
in its S.A.P. ERP system. This extraction and compilation of Financial
Statements is as envisaged in the Scheme of Arrangement and is based on
various allocations made by the management on reasonable bases as
detailed in Note 2 of Schedule T to the Financial Statements and have
been relied upon by us.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2003 as amended
by Companies (Auditor’s Report)(Amendment) Order, 2004 issued by the
Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227
of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on
the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report
that:
(i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and
Cash Flow Statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956. We draw attention to note No.4 in terms of
section 211(3B) regarding the accounting treatment given of the net
increase in net book value of assets on revaluation of the assets of
the Vadodara undertaking of the Company which is different from that
prescribed by Accounting Standard 10 i.e. Accounting for Fixed Assets,
upon giving effect to the High Court Order confirming the Scheme of
Arrangement.
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the
Directors, as on 31st March, 2011, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the Directors is disqualified as on
31st March, 2011 from being appointed as a Director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section(1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(vi) In view of the inadequate profits as detailed in note no.18, we
draw attention to the fact that the managerial remuneration paid is in
excess of the limits laid down under section 198 and schedule XIII of
the Companies Act, 1956 by Rs.130.76 Lacs and we are informed that the
Company is in process of obtaining the Central Government’s approval,
and therefore the payments made are subject to such approval.
(vii) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according
to the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India;
a) in the case of the Balance Sheet of the state of the affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2011;
b) in case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the Loss for the year
ended on that date; and
c) in the case of Cash Flow Statement of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditor’s Report
Re: Alembic Limited
Referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date,
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and situation of Fixed
Assets. However, item wise value in respect of assets other than land,
buildings and vehicles acquired prior to 1982 are not available.
(b) Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management during
the year as per the phased programme of physical verification of fixed
assets. As informed to us the programme is such that all the fixed
assets will get physically verified in three years time. In our opinion
the same is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the
nature of its fixed assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on
such verification.
(c) During the year, the Pharmaceutical undertaking of the Company got
demerged as per the Scheme of Arrangement and accordingly a substantial
part of its fixed assets have been transferred. However, this has not
affected the Going Concern status of the Company.
(ii) (a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by
the management at reasonable intervals.
(b) The procedures for physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to size of the
Company and nature of its business.
(c) The Company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
(iii) (a) The Company has not granted any unsecured loans the parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956. Therefore, the requirements of clause (b, c, d and e) are
not applicable.
(e) The Company has not taken any unsecured loan from any party covered
in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act,
1956. Therefore, the requirement of clause (f) and (g) are not
applicable.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is an adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the Company and the nature of its business, for the
purchases of inventory and fixed assets and for the sale of goods and
services. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in the internal control
system.
(v) (a) The particulars of contracts or arrangements referred to in
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been entered in the
register required to be maintained under that section.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of such contracts or
arrangements exceeding Rs.5,00,000 have been made at prices which are
reasonable having regard to the prevailing market prices at the
relevant time.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has complied with provisions of Section 58A
and 58AA or any other relevant provision of the Companies Act, 1956 and
the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975 with regard to the
deposits accepted from the public. No order has been passed by the
Company Law Board, National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of
India or any Court or any other Tribunal.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the books of account relating to
materials, labour and other items of cost maintained by the Company
pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under Section 209 (1)(d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 and we are of the opinion that, prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained. However, we have
not made a detailed examination of the records for determining whether
they are accurate or complete.
(ix) (a) The Company is generally regular in depositing with
appropriate authorities, undisputed statutory dues including Provident
Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Employee’s State
Insurance, Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty,
Excise Duty, Cess and any other material statutory dues applicable to
it and there are no arrears outstanding as at the year end for a period
of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(b) According to the records of the Company, the following dues of
Sales Tax, Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise
Duty and Cess have not been deposited on account of some dispute or are
partially deposited under protest.
Statute & Nature Amount not de Forum where dispute Period
of dues. Period poisited is pending
Rs.
Sales Tax Act
80,16,782 Joint Commissioner-
Appeals 2000-01
Sales Tax, inte
rest and penalty
15,48,517 Joint Commissioner-
(Appeals) 2002-03
The Central
Excise Act 11,60,818 CESTAT, Comm. (A) 1999-2000
Excise Duty,
Interest & Penalty
5,00,000 CESTAT, Comm. (A) 2001-2002
1,58,414 CESTAT, Comm. (A) 2004 to
2009
59,77,921 Supreme Court 1995-96
21,10,720 Supreme Court 1996-97
35,21,786 Supreme Court 2003-04
(x) The Company does not have any accumulated losses as per the Balance
Sheet as at the end of the financial year. The Company has incurred
the cash losses during the financial year covered by our audit but did
not incur any cash losses in the immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to a
financial institution, bank or debenture holders.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) The Company is not a Chit Fund or a Nidhi/Mutual Benefit
Fund/Society. Therefore, the provisions of Clauses 4(xiii) of the
Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2003 (as amended) are not
applicable to the Company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order,
2003 (as amended) are not applicable to the Company.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
term loans have been applied for the purpose for which the loans were
obtained.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us, and
on an overall examination of Balance Sheet of the Company, we report
that Rs.960.97 Lacs of funds raised on short-term basis have been used
for long term investment/applications.
(xviii) The Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The company has created security in respect of debentures issued.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money during the year by public
issue.
(xxi) As per the information and explanations given to us, no fraud on
or by the Company has been noticed or reported during the course of our
audit.
For K.S. AIYAR & CO.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No.100186W
RAGHUVIR M. AIYAR
Partner
Membership No. 38128
Mumbai : 2nd May, 2011
|